Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (idunn.apache.osuosl.org: domain iona.com designates
 65.223.216.181 as permitted sender)
From: "Jim Ma" <jim.ma@iona.com>
To: <cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Tooling Proposal [was Re: tooling and service model]
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:14:24 +0800
Message-ID: <NJEGKBFJCOPBPCAHACGLMEIECLAA.jim.ma@iona.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <45142411.7090401@envoisolutions.com>

> Jim Ma wrote:
>=20
> >Hi Dan ,=20
> >
> >It looks like a very good plan. Just some concerns about item 6.
> >=20
> >[1]  Now wsdl2java can generate ant build.xml for user.   ASFAIK=20
>  with code model it  will take more effort to do this .=20
> > =20
> >
> I was just suggesting codemodel for use in gneerating java artifacts.
  =20
 Then we still need to use our model to generate the stuff other than =
java artifact .  It 's not ideal .=20
 Is there other more powerful code model for use?            =20
=20
>=20
> >[2]  If java2wsdl use the service model  as mediate model to=20
> generate wsdl, service model also need to refactor to contain=20
> extra information for  wsdl . =20
> >
> > =20
> >
> I don't know of any such missing information - could you elaborate?
>
    =20
   So far I can think of  are : the generated schema info and  parameter =
order.
 =20
=20
> - Dan
>=20
> --=20
> Dan Diephouse
> (616) 971-2053
> Envoi Solutions LLC
> http://netzooid.com
>=20