Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 22388 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2006 11:58:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2006 11:58:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 39062 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2006 11:58:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38950 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2006 11:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38941 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2006 11:58:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 04:58:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [207.113.241.148] (HELO iss04.interliant.com) (207.113.241.148) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Sep 2006 04:58:46 -0700 Received: from EX-009.mail.navisite.com (ex-009.interliant.com [207.113.240.184]) by iss04.interliant.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id k88BwOY16471 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2006 06:58:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] ([88.109.141.165]) by EX-009.mail.navisite.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 8 Sep 2006 06:58:21 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9D2F6707-2907-4184-A82B-58D401DBA868@jboss.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Mark Little Subject: Re: Pre-requisite for WS_RM: WS_Addressing etc Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 12:59:36 +0100 To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2006 11:58:21.0455 (UTC) FILETIME=[14A6D9F0:01C6D33E] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 8 Sep 2006, at 12:36, Glynn, Eoghan wrote: > > Jervis, > > I'm working on WS-Adressing support. The current status is that the > SOAP-specific piece is complete and committed, and I'm working on the > SOAP-independent bit. Eoghan, let me know if you want to test this out at some point for interoperability. We still have our endpoint from when we took part in the TC interoperability meeting earlier this year and can work with you on any issues that may arise. Mark. > > The other main prerequisite for RM is decoupled response correlation, > which I intend to work on next week. > > One final issue we probably want to address also is that all the > interceptor chain participation is currently API-driven - i.e. > inpterceptors are added to the relevant chains programmatically via > InterceptorProvider.get{In|Out|Fault}Interceptors().add() as > opposed to > a configuration-driven mechanism. The latter will be increasingly > called > for in order to engage the RM interceptors, as one of the goals of > Celtix RM support was to allow reliability to be introduced without > any > changes to application code. So maybe a config mechanism for > interceptor > chains would be a good initial task for you? > > Cheers, > Eoghan > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Liu, Jervis >> Sent: 08 September 2006 10:54 >> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Pre-requisite for WS_RM: WS_Addressing etc >> >> Hi, I am very interested in getting myself involved in >> WS-ReliableMessaging support >> (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-44). As a >> pre-requisite, I wonder what the status of WS_Addressing is, >> so that I can plan WS_RM work properly into CXF milestone >> one. Also is there anything else I should be aware of that >> might impact the delivery of WS_RM? Thanks. >> >> Cheers, >> Jervis >> >>