Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <451F26FC.1010401@envoisolutions.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 22:25:00 -0400
From: Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CXF & Celtix performance test result
References: <451E386B.5010901@iona.com>
 <244F5835C09CB641AE1D928BB2B0B9D80216D111@amereast-ems2.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
 <244F5835C09CB641AE1D928BB2B0B9D80216D112@amereast-ems2.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
In-Reply-To: 
 <244F5835C09CB641AE1D928BB2B0B9D80216D112@amereast-ems2.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

How many client threads are being run here?
Thanks,
- Dan

Jiang, Ning (Willem) wrote:

>I finally realized the mail list had remove my attached file.
>I had to copy the test result to this mail, sorry for the format. 
>
>	Basic Type test (Echo String) 	
>
>	Celtix 1.0 	CXF 2.0M1
>Client 	Through put 	Response Time(ms) Through put 	Response Time (ms)
>1 	244.26  4.09 	599.09  	1.67
>2 	387.49 	5.16 	1119.08 	1.79
>3 	529.71 	5.66 	1541.06 	1.95
>4 	569.81 	7.02 	1904.97 	2.1
>5 	685.51 	7.29 	2175.04 	2.3
>6 	737.4 	8.14 	2377.22 	2.52
>7 	738.05 	9.48 	2539.41 	2.76
>8 	732.47 	10.92 	2617.16 	3.06
>9 	724.99 	12.41 	2572.39 	3.5
>10 	717.44 	13.94 	2521.87 	3.97
>
>
>	Complex Type test (Echo Struct) 	
>
>	Celtix 1.0 	CXF 2.0M1
>Client 	Through put 	Response Time(ms) Through put 	Response Time (ms)
>1 	184.4 	5.42 	359.13  	2.79
>2 	314.26 	6.36 	660.66  	3.03
>3 	430.01 	6.98 	885.91  	3.39
>4 	497.89 	8.03 	1095.78 	3.65
>5 	571.39 	8.75 	1256.33 	3.98
>6 	607.29 	9.88 	1401.40 	4.28
>7 	607.18 	11.53 	1482.88 	4.72
>8 	632.96 	12.64 	1511.44 	5.29
>9 	595.55 	15.11 	1513.82 	5.95
>10 	636.09 	15.72 	1473.38 	6.79
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Jiang, Ning (Willem)
>Sent:	2006-9-30 (������) 20:34
>To:	cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Cc:	
>Subject:	FW: CXF & Celtix performance test result
>
>
>Sorry, I forgot to attache the result html.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:	Jiang, Ning (Willem)
>Sent:	2006-9-30 (������) 5:27
>To:	cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Cc:	
>Subject:	CXF & Celtix performance test result
>
>Hi ,
>
>I just finished the CXF performance test base on Dan Kulp's latest 
>performance tuning. 
>Here is the test result, attached as HTML.
>It is great news that the result shows CXF is 2~3 times fastter than Celtix.
>
>The test case is in the trunk/test/performance/.
>Basic_Type just test echo string for 1K message
>Complex_Type test  echo struct for about 2K complex type message.
>
>Test had been done with  2  DELL Workstation 670 , Linux ES3.0,  2 CPU 
>2.8 GHZ,  memory 2G
>(one run as server  the  other run as  client)
> 
>Cheers,
>Willem.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
Dan Diephouse
(616) 971-2053
Envoi Solutions LLC
http://netzooid.com