Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of james.mao@iona.com designates
 63.65.132.112 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <450E1021.2000104@iona.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:18:57 +0800
From: James Mao <james.mao@iona.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: tooling and service model
References: <450AB210.8050101@envoisolutions.com>
In-Reply-To: <450AB210.8050101@envoisolutions.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi Dan,

Actually Tom and I already started working on that. and we will create 
jira tasks, later you can review and comment on that.
And i think WSDL2 is going to next Milestone, right? I think SOAP1.2 is 
more important than WSDL2 at moment.

I have finished the Dispatch/Provider with XML/HTTP support , and i 
think Jervis have got the provider based RESTful service working, and 
later he will add the demo to show how it works.
Pretty much like the provider based RESTful service in JAX-WS RI.
For the provider based RESTful service, seems that there's no need to 
get the tools support REST. Can you provide other use cases which need 
tools support.
I know the provider based RESTful service is just a small start though.

Thanks,
James.

Dan Diephouse 写道:
> Has anyone started on refactoring the tooling to use the service model 
> yet? Guillaume and I were talking about chatting a bit about WSDL2 & 
> REST and I think it would be cool to add support for it. Its easy 
> enough to start on the wsdl2->service model & service model -> wsdl2 
> conversions, but we still need the tooling support.
>
> If no one is doing anything with it, I may take a stab at some of it 
> early next week.
> Cheers,
> - Dan
>