cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jiang Ning <ning.ji...@iona.com>
Subject Re: What kind of components should be managed in CXF
Date Sat, 30 Sep 2006 05:09:15 GMT
Just find some typo error.

Jiang Ning wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am going to start to instrument the CXF runtime components [1], so I 
> want to start a thread to discuss the requirements of CXF runtime 
> components management.
> The general framework CXF management ideal is based on the Celtix,  
> each managed component has an instrumentation object to wrap the 
> management information which can be described by annotation and the 
> instrumentation object can be export to JMX as MBean dynamically.
> So we can go through to see what kind of components should be managed 
> in CXF.
> Because of the management mainly on the server side, we main focus on 
> the  endpoint which has been published by  CXF.
> The hierarchy of the server side components just like the service 
> model.    

Server 
--> Endpoint   
--> Binding
-->Transport

> Each of these components should have its name (QName), states 
> attributes and some other important attibutes.
>
> The core components of runtime

     ActiveWorkQueue  (CXF  threadpool)

>   Some key feature's configuration of the CXF, such as
>   SchameValidation
>   MTOM Enabled
>     
> Please feel free to add you comments.
>
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-70
> Thanks,
> Willem.
>
>
>


Mime
View raw message