cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Mao <>
Subject Re: SAAJ Construction Proposal
Date Wed, 27 Sep 2006 06:04:53 GMT
Do u mean that we are going to implement by ourself? and replace the 
current SAAJ impl?
I think it's ok as along as the api is same.
The provider/dispatch used the SAAJ, because the api do require us the 
support SOAPMessage.
Wondering if it'll be a good idea to have this as a separate project? so 
other projects may use your high performance SAAJ impl.


Dan Diephouse 写道:
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
>> I know there was some discussion about implementing SAAJ mode - has 
>> anyone started on that yet or were we just talkin about it? :-)
>> Cheers,
>> - Dan
> OK, since no one responded, I'd like to suggest that we construct the 
> SAAJ document from the xmlstreamreader. A couple reasons for this: 
> First, I think SAAJ uses SAX underneath and Woodstox is way faster 
> than xerces (median of 2-3x faster from tests I've seen), so we should 
> get a performance benefit. Second, it'd be easy to lazy load the Body 
> this way. What do people think?
> - Dan

View raw message