Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 77262 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2006 15:52:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Aug 2006 15:52:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 36864 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2006 15:52:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36825 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2006 15:52:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36812 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2006 15:52:54 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:52:54 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [216.148.227.152] (HELO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) (216.148.227.152) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:52:53 -0700 Received: from [192.168.3.100] (c-71-205-191-164.hsd1.mi.comcast.net[71.205.191.164]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20060830155232m1200mj1kje>; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:52:32 +0000 Message-ID: <44F5B480.5020400@envoisolutions.com> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 11:53:36 -0400 From: Dan Diephouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Moving some interfaces & abstract classes from rt-bindings-soap to api References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Glynn, Eoghan wrote: > Folks, > > Anyone object if I move SoapInterceptor, AbstractSoapInterceptor, > SoapMessage and SoapVersion to the api module, so that interceptors such > as WS-A/RM don't have to take a direct dependency on the > rt-bindings-soap module? > > Cheers, > Eoghan > > I'm -0 on this. Wouldn't it make sense to have WS-A depend on the soap module? I know that WS-A at least has sections which deal directly with SOAP, no? - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com http://netzooid.com/blog