Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 80426 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2006 19:00:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Aug 2006 19:00:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 59398 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 19:00:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59363 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2006 19:00:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80347 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2006 18:17:23 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of balaji.mosurravi@iona.com designates 65.223.216.181 as permitted sender) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 Subject: RE: Project name... Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 14:16:58 -0400 Message-ID: <296718BFC6B9E94FB0A809F55834237A03C96F60@amereast-ems2.IONAGLOBAL.COM> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Project name... Thread-Index: Aca7Frb3UzHoCU88QASPIRKgQKX+2QAABD/A From: "Mosur Ravi, Balaji" To: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 for CXF... - Balaji -----Original Message----- From: Bill Dudney [mailto:bdudney@apache.org]=20 Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 2:15 PM To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Project name... I like little work :-) 'CXF is the name' works fine for me, its easy and would require very =20 little disruption of the project. We can revisit this during graduation. TTFN, -bd- On Aug 8, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > At this point, I'd prefer something completely different from =20 > either Celtix or > Xfire. Any ideas? > > > I've been kind of flipping through the apache speaking dictionary at: > http://www.wusd.k12.az.us/Links/Staff/BGood/Apachedictionary/=20 > Apachedict.html > figuring names in another language that barely anyone speaks should =20 > have very > little trademark issues. Unfortunately, I don't really like any =20 > of them. > I guess I don't have enough Indian in me. :-) (more like: none) > > Maybe: > jaage - apache for antelope > google just shows up some song title with it. > > > I thought about Calumet (native american peace pipe) to be a =20 > "bringing people > together" type thing, but apparently there is a Calumet region in =20 > Wisconsin > and another in Michigan, and, after the Glasgow fiasco, I'm =20 > reluctant to > suggest anything that remotely resembles a location. There is also a > calumetsoftware.com. > > > I don't know. I'm not creative enough to come up with a good =20 > name. Maybe > just leave the whole project name as "CXF" and say "It doesn't =20 > stand for > anything, that's the name". That's the least work for Jason. :-) > > > Dan > > > > On Tuesday August 08 2006 10:20 am, Dan Diephouse wrote: >> I am open to a new name. I did ask around for suggestions =20 >> initially, but >> I don't recall people suggesting anything really good. Do people have >> suggestions? There is a pretty diverse set of people around here, I >> would imagine *someone* has some brilliant ideas :-) >> >> - Dan >> >> Hani Suleiman wrote: >>> Please, for the love of god, change it. >>> >>> Even plain old cxfire is better. The name as it stands is awful. =20 >>> It'd >>> be nice if we could have a name that'd actually match the package >>> name too. >>> >>> cfire? celfire? cexfire (teehee)? >>> >>> On Aug 7, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>>> When we made the CeltiXfire proposal, I know there was a lot of >>>> feedback >>>> regarding the name. Some liked it, some hated it, there were >>>> concerns of >>>> trademarks, etc... >>>> >>>> I know everyone basically said the name issues could be =20 >>>> resolved during >>>> incubating, but it would be nice to resolve it sooner. We're =20 >>>> going >>>> to have >>>> to do a major package rename (org.objectweb/org.codehaus -> >>>> org.apache) and >>>> it would be nice to settle on the next at the same time to =20 >>>> minimize the >>>> disruption. >>>> >>>> So, the question is: do we have to change the name or is =20 >>>> celtixfire >>>> acceptable? (with the proposed package name being =20 >>>> org.apache.cxf) Can >>>> someone make heads/tails of all the recent naming discussions =20 >>>> on the >>>> general >>>> incubating list and figure out if we do or do not need to change =20 >>>> it? >>>> Trying to follow all those discussions is making my head spin. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> J. Daniel Kulp >>>> Principal Engineer >>>> IONA >>>> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 >>>> daniel.kulp@iona.com > > --=20 > J. Daniel Kulp > Principal Engineer > IONA > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001 > daniel.kulp@iona.com