Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of daniel.kulp@iona.com designates
 63.65.132.112 as permitted sender)
From: Daniel Kulp <daniel.kulp@iona.com>
To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: version number....
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:29:06 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4
References: <200608251119.21315.daniel.kulp@iona.com>
In-Reply-To: <200608251119.21315.daniel.kulp@iona.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200608281529.06389.daniel.kulp@iona.com>


Looks like it's pretty unanimous to go with a 2.0 version number.   I'm going 
to update the poms to have the version number:

2.0-incubator-M1-SNAPSHOT

I'm also going to update the top level pom's distribution management section 
to reflect the new incubating repository guidelines at:
http://www.apache.org/dev/repository-faq.html

Dan


On Friday August 25 2006 11:19 am, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Right now, the poms all are set to 1.1-SNAPSHOT.   Since we have to change
> them, what are people's thoughts on the version number.   Couple of
> options:
>
> 1) 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT  - since it's the first apache version
> 2) 2.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT  - since both XFire and Celtix had 1.x releases
> 3) Other options?
>
> I'm kind of leaning toward option (2).    Actually, probably do:
>  2.0-incubating-m1-SNAPSHOT
> to reflect we're working toward milestone 1.   Then hopefully start
> releasing periodic milestones.
>
> Any thoughts!

-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001
daniel.kulp@iona.com