cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@visi.com>
Subject Re: Project name...
Date Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:31:06 GMT
I particularly like Apache Solas, though there are things out there  
called Apache and things called Solas.

Considering the prior name contained "fire", which gives light, I  
consider Solas to be a romantic upgrade.

-David

On Aug 14, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Johnson, Eric wrote:

> I think the best approach would be to get away from any ties to the  
> two
> legacy projects in the name of the new one. Let's get a clean slate  
> and
> avoid any confusion with the legacy projects.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kulp, John Daniel
>> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 5:15 PM
>> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Project name...
>>
>>
>> Just a quick summary of the ideas on the thread so far....
>> I've seen some
>> positive interest in:
>>
>> Leave as CeltiXfire
>> CXF - no meaning, just CXF
>> cxfire
>> celfire
>> cexfire
>> Solas
>> Ceol
>> Bodhran
>> cerveza (or some variant like cerweza, xerveza, etc...) foam
>> (or xfoam)
>>
>> Are there any I missed?   Any additional ideas?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday August 07 2006 6:12 pm, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>> When we made the CeltiXfire proposal, I know there was a
>> lot of feedback
>>> regarding the name.   Some liked it, some hated it, there
>> were concerns of
>>> trademarks, etc...
>>>
>>> I know everyone basically said the name issues could be
>> resolved during
>>> incubating, but it would be nice to resolve it sooner.
>> We're going to
>>> have to do a major package rename (org.objectweb/org.codehaus ->
>>> org.apache) and it would be nice to settle on the next at the same
>>> time to minimize the disruption.
>>>
>>> So, the question is:  do we have to change the name or is celtixfire
>>> acceptable? (with the proposed package name being
>> org.apache.cxf)   Can
>>> someone make heads/tails of all the recent naming
>> discussions on the
>>> general incubating list and figure out if we do or do not need to
>>> change it? Trying to follow all those discussions is making
>> my head spin.
>>
>> --
>> J. Daniel Kulp
>> Principal Engineer
>> IONA
>> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001
>> daniel.kulp@iona.com
>>
>


Mime
View raw message