cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hani Suleiman <h...@formicary.net>
Subject Re: Project name...
Date Tue, 08 Aug 2006 18:45:19 GMT
How about foam? lightweight soap!

Maybe bung in an x in front of it for googlability.

On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:

>
> At this point, I'd prefer something completely different from  
> either Celtix or
> Xfire.   Any ideas?
>
>
> I've been kind of flipping through the apache speaking dictionary  at:
> http://www.wusd.k12.az.us/Links/Staff/BGood/Apachedictionary/ 
> Apachedict.html
> figuring names in another language that barely anyone speaks should  
> have very
> little trademark issues.    Unfortunately, I don't really like any  
> of them.
> I guess I don't have enough Indian in me.  :-)    (more like: none)
>
> Maybe:
> jaage   -  apache for antelope
> google just shows up some song title with it.
>
>
> I thought about Calumet (native american peace pipe) to be a  
> "bringing people
> together" type thing, but apparently there is a Calumet region in  
> Wisconsin
> and another in Michigan, and, after the Glasgow fiasco, I'm  
> reluctant to
> suggest anything that remotely resembles a location.   There is also a
> calumetsoftware.com.
>
>
> I don't know.  I'm not creative enough to come up with a good  
> name.   Maybe
> just leave the whole project name as "CXF" and say "It doesn't  
> stand for
> anything, that's the name".   That's the least work for Jason.  :-)
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Tuesday August 08 2006 10:20 am, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>> I am open to a new name. I did ask around for suggestions  
>> initially, but
>> I don't recall people suggesting anything really good. Do people have
>> suggestions? There is a pretty diverse set of people around here, I
>> would imagine *someone* has some brilliant ideas :-)
>>
>> - Dan
>>
>> Hani Suleiman wrote:
>>> Please, for the love of god, change it.
>>>
>>> Even plain old cxfire is better. The name as it stands is awful.  
>>> It'd
>>> be nice if we could have a name that'd actually match the package
>>> name too.
>>>
>>> cfire? celfire? cexfire (teehee)?
>>>
>>> On Aug 7, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>>> When we made the CeltiXfire proposal, I know there was a lot of
>>>> feedback
>>>> regarding the name.   Some liked it, some hated it, there were
>>>> concerns of
>>>> trademarks, etc...
>>>>
>>>> I know everyone basically said the name issues could be  
>>>> resolved  during
>>>> incubating, but it would be nice to resolve it sooner.   We're   
>>>> going
>>>> to have
>>>> to do a major package rename (org.objectweb/org.codehaus ->
>>>> org.apache) and
>>>> it would be nice to settle on the next at the same time to  
>>>> minimize  the
>>>> disruption.
>>>>
>>>> So, the question is:  do we have to change the name or is  
>>>> celtixfire
>>>> acceptable? (with the proposed package name being  
>>>> org.apache.cxf)    Can
>>>> someone make heads/tails of all the recent naming discussions  
>>>> on  the
>>>> general
>>>> incubating list and figure out if we do or do not need to change  
>>>> it?
>>>> Trying to follow all those discussions is making my head spin.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> J. Daniel Kulp
>>>> Principal Engineer
>>>> IONA
>>>> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001
>>>> daniel.kulp@iona.com
>
> -- 
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001
> daniel.kulp@iona.com


Mime
View raw message