cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bill Dudney <bdud...@mac.com>
Subject Re: Project name...
Date Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:47:01 GMT
I like xerveza, you can still pronounce it like the spanish word for  
beer but its got the appealing x as the first character :-)

A close second is CXF, no meaning just CXF.

TTFN,

bd-

On Aug 14, 2006, at 3:14 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:

>
> Just a quick summary of the ideas on the thread so far....   I've  
> seen some
> positive interest in:
>
> Leave as CeltiXfire
> CXF - no meaning, just CXF
> cxfire
> celfire
> cexfire
> Solas
> Ceol
> Bodhran
> cerveza (or some variant like cerweza, xerveza, etc...)
> foam (or xfoam)
>
> Are there any I missed?   Any additional ideas?
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> On Monday August 07 2006 6:12 pm, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> When we made the CeltiXfire proposal, I know there was a lot of  
>> feedback
>> regarding the name.   Some liked it, some hated it, there were  
>> concerns of
>> trademarks, etc...
>>
>> I know everyone basically said the name issues could be resolved  
>> during
>> incubating, but it would be nice to resolve it sooner.   We're  
>> going to
>> have to do a major package rename (org.objectweb/org.codehaus ->
>> org.apache) and it would be nice to settle on the next at the same  
>> time to
>> minimize the disruption.
>>
>> So, the question is:  do we have to change the name or is celtixfire
>> acceptable? (with the proposed package name being  
>> org.apache.cxf)   Can
>> someone make heads/tails of all the recent naming discussions on the
>> general incubating list and figure out if we do or do not need to  
>> change
>> it? Trying to follow all those discussions is making my head spin.
>
> -- 
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001
> daniel.kulp@iona.com


Mime
View raw message