cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hani Suleiman <>
Subject Re: Project name...
Date Mon, 07 Aug 2006 22:16:02 GMT
Please, for the love of god, change it.

Even plain old cxfire is better. The name as it stands is awful. It'd  
be nice if we could have a name that'd actually match the package  
name too.

cfire? celfire? cexfire (teehee)?

On Aug 7, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:

> When we made the CeltiXfire proposal, I know there was a lot of  
> feedback
> regarding the name.   Some liked it, some hated it, there were  
> concerns of
> trademarks, etc...
> I know everyone basically said the name issues could be resolved  
> during
> incubating, but it would be nice to resolve it sooner.   We're  
> going to have
> to do a major package rename (org.objectweb/org.codehaus ->  
> org.apache) and
> it would be nice to settle on the next at the same time to minimize  
> the
> disruption.
> So, the question is:  do we have to change the name or is celtixfire
> acceptable? (with the proposed package name being org.apache.cxf)    
> Can
> someone make heads/tails of all the recent naming discussions on  
> the general
> incubating list and figure out if we do or do not need to change it?
> Trying to follow all those discussions is making my head spin.
> -- 
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001

View raw message