cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Diephouse <>
Subject Re: Project name...
Date Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:20:56 GMT
I am open to a new name. I did ask around for suggestions initially, but
I don't recall people suggesting anything really good. Do people have
suggestions? There is a pretty diverse set of people around here, I
would imagine *someone* has some brilliant ideas :-)

- Dan

Hani Suleiman wrote:

> Please, for the love of god, change it.
> Even plain old cxfire is better. The name as it stands is awful. It'd  
> be nice if we could have a name that'd actually match the package  
> name too.
> cfire? celfire? cexfire (teehee)?
> On Aug 7, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> When we made the CeltiXfire proposal, I know there was a lot of  
>> feedback
>> regarding the name.   Some liked it, some hated it, there were  
>> concerns of
>> trademarks, etc...
>> I know everyone basically said the name issues could be resolved  during
>> incubating, but it would be nice to resolve it sooner.   We're  going 
>> to have
>> to do a major package rename (org.objectweb/org.codehaus ->  
>> org.apache) and
>> it would be nice to settle on the next at the same time to minimize  the
>> disruption.
>> So, the question is:  do we have to change the name or is celtixfire
>> acceptable? (with the proposed package name being org.apache.cxf)    Can
>> someone make heads/tails of all the recent naming discussions on  the 
>> general
>> incubating list and figure out if we do or do not need to change it?
>> Trying to follow all those discussions is making my head spin.
>> -- 
>> J. Daniel Kulp
>> Principal Engineer
>> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001

View raw message