cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <>
Subject Re: Project name...
Date Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:14:41 GMT

Just a quick summary of the ideas on the thread so far....   I've seen some 
positive interest in:

Leave as CeltiXfire
CXF - no meaning, just CXF
cerveza (or some variant like cerweza, xerveza, etc...)
foam (or xfoam)

Are there any I missed?   Any additional ideas?


On Monday August 07 2006 6:12 pm, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> When we made the CeltiXfire proposal, I know there was a lot of feedback
> regarding the name.   Some liked it, some hated it, there were concerns of
> trademarks, etc...
> I know everyone basically said the name issues could be resolved during
> incubating, but it would be nice to resolve it sooner.   We're going to
> have to do a major package rename (org.objectweb/org.codehaus ->
> org.apache) and it would be nice to settle on the next at the same time to
> minimize the disruption.
> So, the question is:  do we have to change the name or is celtixfire
> acceptable? (with the proposed package name being org.apache.cxf)   Can
> someone make heads/tails of all the recent naming discussions on the
> general incubating list and figure out if we do or do not need to change
> it? Trying to follow all those discussions is making my head spin.

J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001

View raw message