cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frank Lynch <fr...@iona.com>
Subject Re: Project name...
Date Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:41:47 GMT
+1 I quite like the sound of Apache Solas.

On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 16:31 -0700, David Blevins wrote:
> I particularly like Apache Solas, though there are things out there  
> called Apache and things called Solas.
> 
> Considering the prior name contained "fire", which gives light, I  
> consider Solas to be a romantic upgrade.
> 
> -David
> 
> On Aug 14, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Johnson, Eric wrote:
> 
> > I think the best approach would be to get away from any ties to the  
> > two
> > legacy projects in the name of the new one. Let's get a clean slate  
> > and
> > avoid any confusion with the legacy projects.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Kulp, John Daniel
> >> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 5:15 PM
> >> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Project name...
> >>
> >>
> >> Just a quick summary of the ideas on the thread so far....
> >> I've seen some
> >> positive interest in:
> >>
> >> Leave as CeltiXfire
> >> CXF - no meaning, just CXF
> >> cxfire
> >> celfire
> >> cexfire
> >> Solas
> >> Ceol
> >> Bodhran
> >> cerveza (or some variant like cerweza, xerveza, etc...) foam
> >> (or xfoam)
> >>
> >> Are there any I missed?   Any additional ideas?
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Monday August 07 2006 6:12 pm, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> >>> When we made the CeltiXfire proposal, I know there was a
> >> lot of feedback
> >>> regarding the name.   Some liked it, some hated it, there
> >> were concerns of
> >>> trademarks, etc...
> >>>
> >>> I know everyone basically said the name issues could be
> >> resolved during
> >>> incubating, but it would be nice to resolve it sooner.
> >> We're going to
> >>> have to do a major package rename (org.objectweb/org.codehaus ->
> >>> org.apache) and it would be nice to settle on the next at the same
> >>> time to minimize the disruption.
> >>>
> >>> So, the question is:  do we have to change the name or is celtixfire
> >>> acceptable? (with the proposed package name being
> >> org.apache.cxf)   Can
> >>> someone make heads/tails of all the recent naming
> >> discussions on the
> >>> general incubating list and figure out if we do or do not need to
> >>> change it? Trying to follow all those discussions is making
> >> my head spin.
> >>
> >> --
> >> J. Daniel Kulp
> >> Principal Engineer
> >> IONA
> >> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194   F:781-902-8001
> >> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> >>
> >
> 


Mime
View raw message