Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-curator-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-curator-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE326101CA for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65963 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2015 17:55:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-curator-user-archive@curator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65919 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2015 17:55:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@curator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@curator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@curator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65909 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2015 17:55:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:55:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.192.182] (HELO mail-pd0-f182.google.com) (209.85.192.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:54:58 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id z10so20118677pdj.13 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:54:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=xra6LZHrBcMhjsrpjX0vPD1W8RHW5pyfYmoAZfVlMWM=; b=VLR5+eoJuznUuvM3zVPpN7eTJcdcHuMg1DCFh0/lX003V7bpHEkYa6AI1lFsT4hBbH 6u6BrCsJE4MdZCSutl+hMTL7YTHWnZi5KEQ711lA7VmJd2CzEQHatHa893H2LHkrasRk nREl9gHk0QPCmZTDz9+xv6eXn5HErRzhFoby6L83D8qe1QkRSbbUtGoV0k6v800la5/9 IqeJn6HH/iJfuwBxMS9+lBqGauT6j5nUz+gX5kUzx5C716HHJfCEJYbtCiUYDd27wubq bxMoYRJQyQEqDj4wD6AuPbou2eSChBYfzwvvpSj0nMgbJFIDn21GgKzZ6hhcjXJnppyG SWQw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm4BC9862WvkvL36ec4IYAOrgAne+Brv/nQvGg/eEilRDDXfh9KOhF573VCd2DN4TNjrq0w X-Received: by 10.70.135.233 with SMTP id pv9mr4300760pdb.48.1422381258001; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:54:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from Jordans-MacBook-Pro.local ([190.141.38.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rb5sm2266337pab.14.2015.01.27.09.54.16 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:54:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:54:15 -0500 From: Jordan Zimmerman To: Ricardo Ferreira Cc: user@curator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Regarding leadership status X-Mailer: Airmail (286) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="54c7d0c7_19495cff_13d" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --54c7d0c7_19495cff_13d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline No. If a non-leader dies there is not a new leader election. The current leader stays leader. -JZ On January 27, 2015 at 12:50:43 PM, Ricardo Ferreira (ricardojsfer@gmail.com) wrote: And from what you described, it gets worse: If a non-leader dies, leadership election will take place and a new leader might be elected, right? --54c7d0c7_19495cff_13d Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline