curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CURATOR-3.0 tests
Date Mon, 13 Jun 2016 03:22:53 GMT
Yep, I will try and do it tomorrow
On 13 Jun 2016 1:19 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com>
wrote:

> Sure - you OK doing it?
>
> > On Jun 12, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > It could probably just be the remaining amount of time until session
> > timeout couldn't it? We should know at what time the last event was as we
> > use this to calculate when the list event occurs
> > On 13 Jun 2016 12:54 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah - that was my thinking but, really, it could be done more often.
> >> Maybe 1/3 instead of 2/3? It wouldn’t do any harm really. Just as long
> as
> >> it doesn’t turn into a spin loop.
> >>
> >> -Jordan
> >>
> >>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 2:13 AM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Jordan, do you remember what the rationale behind only waiting for 2/3
> of
> >>> the session timeout is? It's something to do with the way that ZK
> itself
> >>> handles session timeouts isn't it? Does ZK timeout the session if it
> >> hasn't
> >>> received a heartbeat for 2/3 of the session timeout? I can't remember.
> >>> cheers
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message