curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CURATOR-3.0 tests
Date Sun, 05 Jun 2016 23:42:35 GMT
hey Jordan,
The fix for CURATOR-335 looks good to me, but I'm wondering if it should
actually be applied against master and then merged into 3.0?

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:

> no worries - get well.
>
> > On Jun 2, 2016, at 9:20 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for sorting this out Jordan. I'm pretty sick today so won't get
> > around to looking at it, but I will try over the weekend or really next
> week
> > On 3 Jun 2016 7:05 AM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> It sounds like curator is using a different algorithm since it has
> >>> nodes sorting their position to determine if they have a lease or not.
> >>
> >> No - I just added that as I thought there was a bug. But, now I realize
> >> I’m wrong. So, it was correct all along. Thanks Ben.
> >>
> >> -Jordan
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message