curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Subject Re: CURATOR-3.0 tests
Date Mon, 13 Jun 2016 02:54:20 GMT
Yeah - that was my thinking but, really, it could be done more often. Maybe 1/3 instead of
2/3? It wouldn’t do any harm really. Just as long as it doesn’t turn into a spin loop.

-Jordan

> On Jun 7, 2016, at 2:13 AM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Jordan, do you remember what the rationale behind only waiting for 2/3 of
> the session timeout is? It's something to do with the way that ZK itself
> handles session timeouts isn't it? Does ZK timeout the session if it hasn't
> received a heartbeat for 2/3 of the session timeout? I can't remember.
> cheers


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message