curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Subject Re: CURATOR-3.0 tests
Date Mon, 13 Jun 2016 03:18:54 GMT
Sure - you OK doing it?

> On Jun 12, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> It could probably just be the remaining amount of time until session
> timeout couldn't it? We should know at what time the last event was as we
> use this to calculate when the list event occurs
> On 13 Jun 2016 12:54 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Yeah - that was my thinking but, really, it could be done more often.
>> Maybe 1/3 instead of 2/3? It wouldn’t do any harm really. Just as long as
>> it doesn’t turn into a spin loop.
>> 
>> -Jordan
>> 
>>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 2:13 AM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Jordan, do you remember what the rationale behind only waiting for 2/3 of
>>> the session timeout is? It's something to do with the way that ZK itself
>>> handles session timeouts isn't it? Does ZK timeout the session if it
>> hasn't
>>> received a heartbeat for 2/3 of the session timeout? I can't remember.
>>> cheers
>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message