Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FAFC18E23 for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:45:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99043 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2016 19:45:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@curator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98970 invoked by uid 500); 30 Apr 2016 19:45:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@curator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@curator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@curator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98846 invoked by uid 99); 30 Apr 2016 19:45:13 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:45:13 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E152C1F5D for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:45:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Jordan Zimmerman (JIRA)" To: dev@curator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-233) Bug in double barrier MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15265450#comment-15265450 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on CURATOR-233: ------------------------------------------ I'm going to try to take over this task as [~mdrob] is MIA. Can the test you attached be converted to a unit test? It would be far easier to see and maintain the issue. > Bug in double barrier > --------------------- > > Key: CURATOR-233 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-233 > Project: Apache Curator > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Recipes > Affects Versions: 2.8.0 > Reporter: J D > Assignee: Mike Drob > Fix For: 2.10.1, 3.1.1 > > Attachments: DoubleBarrierClient.java, DoubleBarrierTester.java > > > Hi, > I think I discovered a bug in the internalLeave method of the double barrier implementation. > When a client is told to leave the barrier after maxWait it does not do so. A flag is set but the client does not leave the barrier, instead it keeps iterating through the control loop and drives CPU usage to 100%. > I have attached an example. > Best regards > Lianro -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)