curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0
Date Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:54:12 GMT
I’d really like to do a simultaneous release. So, I’ll cancel this release.

-Jordan

> On Feb 9, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Actually let me clarify..
> 
> +1 on 2.10.0
> -1 on 3.1.0
> 
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com <mailto:dragonsinth@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> Going to -1 until we track down the TestTreeCache failures (today).  Also, floated a
potential issue with NamespaceWatcher under separate subject.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com <mailto:dragonsinth@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> Let me take a look tomorrow.  I had no idea they were failing on 3.0.  Maybe this was
known-failures masking unknown-failures.
> 
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <mailto:jordan@jordanzimmerman.com>>
wrote:
> Should we cancel the release? Scott?
> 
> > On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com <mailto:mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > The tree cache tests still seem to be failing for me on the 3.0 branch
> > though.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com <mailto:mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> OK, let me rerun the tests. I think that making the tests more reliable
> >> would definitely be a good thing. I'm happy to have a look into this also.
> >> cheers
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <mailto:jordan@jordanzimmerman.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Many tests are flakey and fail/pass. I have plans to address this in the
> >>> future. But, I don’t think it should hold the release as it’s been the
case
> >>> for a long time. But, I’m OK with whatever the group decides.
> >>>
> >>> -JZ
> >>>
> >>>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
<mailto:mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Keys verify OK.
> >>>>
> >>>> 2.10.0:
> >>>>
> >>>> TestBoundedDistributedQueue.testMulti failed on the first run, but
> >>> passed
> >>>> subsequently, so I guess this is ok.
> >>>>
> >>>> 3.1.0:
> >>>>
> >>>> Failed tests:
> >>>>
> >>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
> >>>> Run 1:
> >>>>
> >>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:533->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED] but
> >>> found
> >>>> [INITIALIZED]
> >>>> Run 2:
> >>>>
> >>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:537->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:178
> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=NODE_ADDED, data=ChildData{path='/test',
> >>>> stat=2,2,1454970465429,1454970465429,0,0,0,0,9,0,2
> >>>> , data=[49, 50, 55, 46, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49]}} expected [/test/one] but
> >>>> found [/test]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
> >>>> Run 1:
> >>>>
> >>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate:371->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED] but
> >>> found
> >>>> [INITIALIZED]
> >>>> Run 2: PASS
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <randgalt@apache.org
<mailto:randgalt@apache.org>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a combined vote to release Apache Curator versions 2.10.0
and
> >>> 3.1.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> >>>>> provided for convenience.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Link to release notes:
> >>>>> 2.1.10 -
> >>>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942>
> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
> >>>>>
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Staging repos:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/>
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/ <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Binary artifacts:
> >>>>> 2.1.10 -
> >>>>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1020
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1020>
> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
> >>>>>
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1021
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1021>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The tags to be voted upon:
> >>>>> 2.10.0 -
> >>>>>
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=eaaba2fe96a964654631ed4248315f83ea677521
<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=eaaba2fe96a964654631ed4248315f83ea677521>
> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
> >>>>>
> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=2cd4babca1720cd3acb501d76d5c2fad90aaf2c9
<https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=2cd4babca1720cd3acb501d76d5c2fad90aaf2c9>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS <http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1  approve
> >>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message