curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0
Date Tue, 09 Feb 2016 03:21:08 GMT
+1

The tree cache tests still seem to be failing for me on the 3.0 branch
though.

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
wrote:

> OK, let me rerun the tests. I think that making the tests more reliable
> would definitely be a good thing. I'm happy to have a look into this also.
> cheers
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>
>> Many tests are flakey and fail/pass. I have plans to address this in the
>> future. But, I don’t think it should hold the release as it’s been the case
>> for a long time. But, I’m OK with whatever the group decides.
>>
>> -JZ
>>
>> > On Feb 8, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Keys verify OK.
>> >
>> > 2.10.0:
>> >
>> > TestBoundedDistributedQueue.testMulti failed on the first run, but
>> passed
>> > subsequently, so I guess this is ok.
>> >
>> > 3.1.0:
>> >
>> > Failed tests:
>> >
>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
>> >  Run 1:
>> >
>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:533->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
>> > TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED] but
>> found
>> > [INITIALIZED]
>> >  Run 2:
>> >
>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:537->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:178
>> > TreeCacheEvent{type=NODE_ADDED, data=ChildData{path='/test',
>> > stat=2,2,1454970465429,1454970465429,0,0,0,0,9,0,2
>> > , data=[49, 50, 55, 46, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49]}} expected [/test/one] but
>> > found [/test]
>> >
>> >
>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
>> >  Run 1:
>> >
>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate:371->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
>> > TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED] but
>> found
>> > [INITIALIZED]
>> >  Run 2: PASS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <randgalt@apache.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> This is a combined vote to release Apache Curator versions 2.10.0 and
>> 3.1.0
>> >>
>> >> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>> >>
>> >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
>> >> provided for convenience.
>> >>
>> >> Link to release notes:
>> >> 2.1.10 -
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942
>> >> 3.1.0 -
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884
>> >>
>> >> Staging repos:
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/
>> >>
>> >> Binary artifacts:
>> >> 2.1.10 -
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1020
>> >> 3.1.0 -
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1021
>> >>
>> >> The tags to be voted upon:
>> >> 2.10.0 -
>> >>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=eaaba2fe96a964654631ed4248315f83ea677521
>> >> 3.1.0 -
>> >>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=2cd4babca1720cd3acb501d76d5c2fad90aaf2c9
>> >>
>> >> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>> >>
>> >> [ ] +1  approve
>> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message