curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0
Date Tue, 09 Feb 2016 23:37:28 GMT
Thanks for sorting this Scott,
I'm running the tests on 3.0 now.
cheers

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com> wrote:

> Alright... pushed!  I think this fixes things.  Thanks for your patience!
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Sounds good - go ahead.
> >
> > On Feb 9, 2016, at 6:02 PM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I want to push a commit to master, merge master into 3.0, and then push
> > another commit into 3.0.  I think this will fix TestTreeCache and also
> > generally make that test fail faster if we write a bad test in the
> future.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I think the problem may be that the new testCreateParents() test is
> >> creating pollution.. working on this now.
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I’d really like to do a simultaneous release. So, I’ll cancel this
> >>> release.
> >>>
> >>> -Jordan
> >>>
> >>> On Feb 9, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Actually let me clarify..
> >>>
> >>> +1 on 2.10.0
> >>> -1 on 3.1.0
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Going to -1 until we track down the TestTreeCache failures (today).
> >>>> Also, floated a potential issue with NamespaceWatcher under separate
> >>>> subject.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Let me take a look tomorrow.  I had no idea they were failing on
3.0.
> >>>>> Maybe this was known-failures masking unknown-failures.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >>>>> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Should we cancel the release? Scott?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> > On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Cameron McKenzie <
> >>>>>> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > +1
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > The tree cache tests still seem to be failing for me on
the 3.0
> >>>>>> branch
> >>>>>> > though.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Cameron McKenzie <
> >>>>>> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >> OK, let me rerun the tests. I think that making the
tests more
> >>>>>> reliable
> >>>>>> >> would definitely be a good thing. I'm happy to have
a look into
> >>>>>> this also.
> >>>>>> >> cheers
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> >>>>>> >> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>> Many tests are flakey and fail/pass. I have plans
to address
> this
> >>>>>> in the
> >>>>>> >>> future. But, I don’t think it should hold the
release as it’s
> >>>>>> been the case
> >>>>>> >>> for a long time. But, I’m OK with whatever the
group decides.
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> -JZ
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie
<
> >>>>>> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>> Keys verify OK.
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>> 2.10.0:
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>> TestBoundedDistributedQueue.testMulti failed
on the first run,
> >>>>>> but
> >>>>>> >>> passed
> >>>>>> >>>> subsequently, so I guess this is ok.
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>> 3.1.0:
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>> Failed tests:
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
> >>>>>> >>>> Run 1:
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:533->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
> >>>>>> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null}
expected
> >>>>>> [NODE_ADDED] but
> >>>>>> >>> found
> >>>>>> >>>> [INITIALIZED]
> >>>>>> >>>> Run 2:
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:537->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:178
> >>>>>> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=NODE_ADDED, data=ChildData{path='/test',
> >>>>>> >>>> stat=2,2,1454970465429,1454970465429,0,0,0,0,9,0,2
> >>>>>> >>>> , data=[49, 50, 55, 46, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49]}}
expected
> >>>>>> [/test/one] but
> >>>>>> >>>> found [/test]
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
> >>>>>> >>>> Run 1:
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate:371->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
> >>>>>> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null}
expected
> >>>>>> [NODE_ADDED] but
> >>>>>> >>> found
> >>>>>> >>>> [INITIALIZED]
> >>>>>> >>>> Run 2: PASS
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman
<
> >>>>>> randgalt@apache.org>
> >>>>>> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> Hello,
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> This is a combined vote to release Apache
Curator versions
> >>>>>> 2.10.0 and
> >>>>>> >>> 3.1.0
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within
approx. 72 hours
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source
(tag) and binaries are
> >>>>>> >>>>> provided for convenience.
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> Link to release notes:
> >>>>>> >>>>> 2.1.10 -
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942
> >>>>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> Staging repos:
> >>>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/
> >>>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> Binary artifacts:
> >>>>>> >>>>> 2.1.10 -
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1020
> >>>>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1021
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> The tags to be voted upon:
> >>>>>> >>>>> 2.10.0 -
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=eaaba2fe96a964654631ed4248315f83ea677521
> >>>>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=2cd4babca1720cd3acb501d76d5c2fad90aaf2c9
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys
we use to sign the
> >>>>>> release:
> >>>>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1  approve
> >>>>>> >>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >>>>>> >>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message