curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0
Date Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:41:27 GMT
OK, let me rerun the tests. I think that making the tests more reliable
would definitely be a good thing. I'm happy to have a look into this also.
cheers

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:

> Many tests are flakey and fail/pass. I have plans to address this in the
> future. But, I don’t think it should hold the release as it’s been the case
> for a long time. But, I’m OK with whatever the group decides.
>
> -JZ
>
> > On Feb 8, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Keys verify OK.
> >
> > 2.10.0:
> >
> > TestBoundedDistributedQueue.testMulti failed on the first run, but passed
> > subsequently, so I guess this is ok.
> >
> > 3.1.0:
> >
> > Failed tests:
> >
> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
> >  Run 1:
> >
> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:533->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
> > TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED] but
> found
> > [INITIALIZED]
> >  Run 2:
> >
> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:537->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:178
> > TreeCacheEvent{type=NODE_ADDED, data=ChildData{path='/test',
> > stat=2,2,1454970465429,1454970465429,0,0,0,0,9,0,2
> > , data=[49, 50, 55, 46, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49]}} expected [/test/one] but
> > found [/test]
> >
> >
> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
> >  Run 1:
> >
> TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate:371->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
> > TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED] but
> found
> > [INITIALIZED]
> >  Run 2: PASS
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <randgalt@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> This is a combined vote to release Apache Curator versions 2.10.0 and
> 3.1.0
> >>
> >> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >>
> >> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> >> provided for convenience.
> >>
> >> Link to release notes:
> >> 2.1.10 -
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942
> >> 3.1.0 -
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884
> >>
> >> Staging repos:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/
> >>
> >> Binary artifacts:
> >> 2.1.10 -
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1020
> >> 3.1.0 -
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1021
> >>
> >> The tags to be voted upon:
> >> 2.10.0 -
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=eaaba2fe96a964654631ed4248315f83ea677521
> >> 3.1.0 -
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=2cd4babca1720cd3acb501d76d5c2fad90aaf2c9
> >>
> >> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> >> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> >>
> >> [ ] +1  approve
> >> [ ] +0  no opinion
> >> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message