curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Blum <dragonsi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0
Date Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:51:04 GMT
Actually let me clarify..

+1 on 2.10.0
-1 on 3.1.0

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com> wrote:

> Going to -1 until we track down the TestTreeCache failures (today).  Also,
> floated a potential issue with NamespaceWatcher under separate subject.
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Let me take a look tomorrow.  I had no idea they were failing on 3.0.
>> Maybe this was known-failures masking unknown-failures.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Should we cancel the release? Scott?
>>>
>>> > On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > The tree cache tests still seem to be failing for me on the 3.0 branch
>>> > though.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Cameron McKenzie <
>>> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> OK, let me rerun the tests. I think that making the tests more
>>> reliable
>>> >> would definitely be a good thing. I'm happy to have a look into this
>>> also.
>>> >> cheers
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>>> >> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Many tests are flakey and fail/pass. I have plans to address this
in
>>> the
>>> >>> future. But, I don’t think it should hold the release as it’s
been
>>> the case
>>> >>> for a long time. But, I’m OK with whatever the group decides.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -JZ
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie <
>>> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Keys verify OK.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 2.10.0:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> TestBoundedDistributedQueue.testMulti failed on the first run,
but
>>> >>> passed
>>> >>>> subsequently, so I guess this is ok.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> 3.1.0:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Failed tests:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
>>> >>>> Run 1:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:533->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
>>> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED]
>>> but
>>> >>> found
>>> >>>> [INITIALIZED]
>>> >>>> Run 2:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:537->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:178
>>> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=NODE_ADDED, data=ChildData{path='/test',
>>> >>>> stat=2,2,1454970465429,1454970465429,0,0,0,0,9,0,2
>>> >>>> , data=[49, 50, 55, 46, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49]}} expected [/test/one]
>>> but
>>> >>>> found [/test]
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
>>> >>>> Run 1:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate:371->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
>>> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED]
>>> but
>>> >>> found
>>> >>>> [INITIALIZED]
>>> >>>> Run 2: PASS
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>>> randgalt@apache.org>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> Hello,
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> This is a combined vote to release Apache Curator versions
2.10.0
>>> and
>>> >>> 3.1.0
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries
are
>>> >>>>> provided for convenience.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Link to release notes:
>>> >>>>> 2.1.10 -
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942
>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Staging repos:
>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/
>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Binary artifacts:
>>> >>>>> 2.1.10 -
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1020
>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1021
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> The tags to be voted upon:
>>> >>>>> 2.10.0 -
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=eaaba2fe96a964654631ed4248315f83ea677521
>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=2cd4babca1720cd3acb501d76d5c2fad90aaf2c9
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
release:
>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> >>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> >>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message