curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Blum <dragonsi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0
Date Tue, 09 Feb 2016 22:55:57 GMT
I think the problem may be that the new testCreateParents() test is
creating pollution.. working on this now.

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:

> I’d really like to do a simultaneous release. So, I’ll cancel this release.
>
> -Jordan
>
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Actually let me clarify..
>
> +1 on 2.10.0
> -1 on 3.1.0
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Going to -1 until we track down the TestTreeCache failures (today).
>> Also, floated a potential issue with NamespaceWatcher under separate
>> subject.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Scott Blum <dragonsinth@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Let me take a look tomorrow.  I had no idea they were failing on 3.0.
>>> Maybe this was known-failures masking unknown-failures.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>>> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Should we cancel the release? Scott?
>>>>
>>>> > On Feb 8, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > +1
>>>> >
>>>> > The tree cache tests still seem to be failing for me on the 3.0 branch
>>>> > though.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Cameron McKenzie <
>>>> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> OK, let me rerun the tests. I think that making the tests more
>>>> reliable
>>>> >> would definitely be a good thing. I'm happy to have a look into
this
>>>> also.
>>>> >> cheers
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>>>> >> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Many tests are flakey and fail/pass. I have plans to address
this
>>>> in the
>>>> >>> future. But, I don’t think it should hold the release as it’s
been
>>>> the case
>>>> >>> for a long time. But, I’m OK with whatever the group decides.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> -JZ
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> On Feb 8, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Cameron McKenzie <
>>>> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Keys verify OK.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> 2.10.0:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> TestBoundedDistributedQueue.testMulti failed on the first
run, but
>>>> >>> passed
>>>> >>>> subsequently, so I guess this is ok.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> 3.1.0:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> Failed tests:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
>>>> >>>> Run 1:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:533->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
>>>> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED]
>>>> but
>>>> >>> found
>>>> >>>> [INITIALIZED]
>>>> >>>> Run 2:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteNodeAfterCloseDoesntCallExecutor:537->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:178
>>>> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=NODE_ADDED, data=ChildData{path='/test',
>>>> >>>> stat=2,2,1454970465429,1454970465429,0,0,0,0,9,0,2
>>>> >>>> , data=[49, 50, 55, 46, 48, 46, 49, 46, 49]}} expected [/test/one]
>>>> but
>>>> >>>> found [/test]
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate(org.apache.curator.framework.recipes.cache.TestTreeCache)
>>>> >>>> Run 1:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> TestTreeCache.testDeleteThenCreate:371->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:158->BaseTestTreeCache.assertEvent:170
>>>> >>>> TreeCacheEvent{type=INITIALIZED, data=null} expected [NODE_ADDED]
>>>> but
>>>> >>> found
>>>> >>>> [INITIALIZED]
>>>> >>>> Run 2: PASS
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>>>> randgalt@apache.org>
>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>> Hello,
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> This is a combined vote to release Apache Curator versions
2.10.0
>>>> and
>>>> >>> 3.1.0
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72
hours
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries
are
>>>> >>>>> provided for convenience.
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Link to release notes:
>>>> >>>>> 2.1.10 -
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942
>>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Staging repos:
>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/
>>>> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Binary artifacts:
>>>> >>>>> 2.1.10 -
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1020
>>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1021
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> The tags to be voted upon:
>>>> >>>>> 2.10.0 -
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=eaaba2fe96a964654631ed4248315f83ea677521
>>>> >>>>> 3.1.0 -
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=2cd4babca1720cd3acb501d76d5c2fad90aaf2c9
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign
the
>>>> release:
>>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>> >>>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>> >>>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message