curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <md...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0, RC2
Date Thu, 11 Feb 2016 18:21:48 GMT
All 2.10 tests pass.
Most 3.1 tests pass, the ones that didn't pass did so when rerun in
isolation.
Signatures match zip file
Zip file matches source tag
Licence headers look good.
Compatibility reports look good.

+1 to both (binding)

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:52 AM, David Kesler <DKesler@yodle.com> wrote:

> Gotcha.  Thanks for the explanation.  Figured it's better to be safe than
> sorry.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jordan Zimmerman [mailto:jordan@jordanzimmerman.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 11:40 AM
> To: dev@curator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0, RC2
>
> ZK 3.5 has an odd version numbering scheme. I’ve complained to them.
> "3.5.1-alpha” is not really an alpha. Lots of people are using it in
> Production. The ZK team wants to communicate that it should be used with
> caution. There will never be a non-alpha 3.5.1. The next version will be
> 3.5.2-alpha, etc. until they’re comfortable to remove the “alpha” tag.
>
> -JZ
>
> > On Feb 11, 2016, at 11:36 AM, David Kesler <DKesler@yodle.com> wrote:
> >
> > *Nonbinding*
> > 2.10.0: +1.  I tested against our internal libraries that use ZK and
> spot-checked a few types of our applications and everything looked fine.
> >
> > I can't check 3.1.0 since I have issues even running with 3.0.0 and
> haven't had time to look into upgrading our stuff to be compatible with
> it.  While trying to test it, I did notice that 3.1.0 is pulling in an
> alpha build of zookeeper (3.5.1-alpha) which seemed kind of odd.  Not sure
> if it's intentional or not, but I thought I'd bring it up.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jordan Zimmerman [mailto:randgalt@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:30 PM
> > To: dev@curator.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.10.0 and 3.1.0, RC2
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is a combined vote to release Apache Curator versions 2.10.0 and
> 3.1.0, RC2
> >
> > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> >
> > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are provided
> for convenience.
> >
> > Link to release notes:
> > 2.1.10 -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333942
> > 3.1.0 -
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12333884
> >
> > Staging repos:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.10.0/
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/3.1.0/
> >
> > Binary artifacts:
> > 2.1.10 -
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1023
> > 3.1.0 -
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1022
> >
> > The tags to be voted upon:
> > 2.10.0 -
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=d7bc24a6e82490a42c87e7ecd14efb209a8f1e66
> > 3.1.0 -
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=a5d3edab7fb290a00cb6ad579671396ca9c1f831
> >
> > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message