Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAF7A176EF for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10410 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2014 05:46:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@curator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10360 invoked by uid 500); 31 Oct 2014 05:46:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@curator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@curator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@curator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10347 invoked by uid 99); 31 Oct 2014 05:46:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:46:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dragonsinth@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.177 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.177] (HELO mail-pd0-f177.google.com) (209.85.192.177) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 05:46:47 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id v10so6560928pde.22 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:46:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TvL6HTj7D3O8IE0qLS/h+DUZM2BI+IWKWPD9jgN8Ft4=; b=jcxrUG+oga/HrT1vP/PsCvnFVFPfmZJNd6zeBexNbLSdAQ08ran9MUXgOeJ+QKODVS nv7BoZdr8iQbbhovvhfG/nrLnTjFt55psXVcN5Suk1e5+ZFtm9kP21Yny8hbGlSZyKsW k4hFctPiR+naVzE61H8qYxElEdBlahCNPk2ejDUsZtYcl77aiwUaersrPcD/jp8z7Ks7 Ou1OJwqeoU+d5zD8SkGOnjdhCmetGnKk2FSLr3KbvDAsGkILXYkFxKAsDpwZuSCKRNpB prh4y0f9miExDsxXDlC6Fu3S4sW8F/EjQ3FSjWapOsnfMXSrz5H/I+voMeITqeA/TSIL HvJw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.69.13.196 with SMTP id fa4mr22578186pbd.65.1414734386579; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.38.232 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:46:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 01:46:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 2.7.0 release? From: Scott Blum To: Jordan Zimmerman Cc: "dev@curator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4501f69051a20506b184f9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b4501f69051a20506b184f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oh wait, looks like it did publish after all, but I had to log in on Nexus to see it and understand what I was even looking at. On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Scott Blum wrote: > The Nexus stuff doesn't seem to be working. I ran through the > instructions up to that point, but I'm not sure where I'm supposed to loo= k > on Nexus. I poked around but don't see anything 2.7.0 anywhere. As far = as > I can tell, everything seemed fine up to that point, although I had to ty= pe > in my gpg passphrase like a billion times (can't get gpg-agent working > properly on mac). > > I'm going to go ahead with the next section tho and push to the svn > dist/dev/curator. I don't really understand the difference between the t= wo > different forms of staging, or why I have to rebuild it so many times. > Wouldn't the artifacts that got installed during step 3 in the first > section be usable in step 2 in the second section? > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Jordan Zimmerman < > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > >> When you=E2=80=99re ready, just follow the instructions here: >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CURATOR/For+Curator+Committe= rs#ForCuratorCommitters-release-curator >> >> Ask questions if/as you run into problems. Like all things Apache, >> everything has to be just-so. >> >> -JZ >> >> >> On October 16, 2014 at 4:09:36 PM, Jordan Zimmerman ( >> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com) wrote: >> >> Sure - OK with me >> >> >> >> On October 16, 2014 at 4:09:11 PM, Scott Blum (dragonsinth@gmail.com) >> wrote: >> >> Sure. Any chance of getting in CURATOR-145 in this release? It's the >> max-depth addition to TreeCache, which can truly let it replace both >> NodeCache and PathChildrenCache. It would be nice to release it with >> max-depth for these cases to get some miles on it. >> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < >> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: >> >> > Folks, >> > >> > I think we should release 2.7.0 at this point (unless there are >> > objections). Scott, would you like to handle the release? >> > >> > -Jordan >> > >> > >> > >> >> > --047d7b4501f69051a20506b184f9--