curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Drob <mad...@cloudera.com>
Subject Re: ZooKeeper 3.5.0 is coming
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:58:28 GMT
I would strongly prefer to have one version, even if it means that we need
to do some reflection hacking under the hood. I think it greatly simplifies
the narrative for users both when starting out and when upgrading.

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:

> I haven’t had time. The upcoming ZooKeeper meetup should give details on
> when to expect 3.5.0. One thing we might need to do is have two versions of
> Curator for a while as not everyone will move to 3.5.0 immediately.
>
> -Jordan
>
>
> On October 24, 2014 at 12:03:41 AM, Cameron McKenzie (
> mckenzie.cam@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Has anyone had any further thoughts about ZK 3.5 and dynamic cluster
> reconfiguration?
>
> I had a look into the EnsembleProvider interface, but I don't think that
> it will work because it is used to create the connection to ZooKeeper, and
> from my (limited) understanding of the way that cluster configuration works
> in ZK 3.5, you need a connection to ZK before you can work out all of the
> nodes in the cluster. So, there is a bit of a chicken and egg problem.
>
> cheers
> Cam
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
>
>>  We could use a label. However, I have version 3.0.0 set for ZK 3.5.x
>> compatibility so we can just use that.
>>
>>  -JZ
>>
>>
>> From: Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com> <madrob@cloudera.com>
>> Reply: dev@curator.apache.org <dev@curator.apache.org>>
>> <dev@curator.apache.org>
>> Date: August 7, 2014 at 10:28:16 AM
>> To: dev@curator.apache.org <dev@curator.apache.org>>
>> <dev@curator.apache.org>
>> Cc: Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>> <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>> Subject:  Re: ZooKeeper 3.5.0 is coming
>>
>>  I saw that they added the ability to remove watches, so that could be a
>> viable approach for CURATOR-14?
>>
>> Are we using a JIRA label to group the issues and make them easily
>> findable?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > I think we should list all the changes that we need to do and get Jira’s
>> > written for them (targeted for version 3.0.0) and then we can divide up
>> the
>> > work.
>> >
>> > -JZ
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie.cam@gmail.com>
>> > Reply: dev@curator.apache.org <dev@curator.apache.org>>
>> > Date: August 7, 2014 at 12:45:21 AM
>> > To: dev@curator.apache.org <dev@curator.apache.org>>
>> > Subject: Re: ZooKeeper 3.5.0 is coming
>> >
>> > I'm happy to start looking into this in a bit more detail unless someone
>> > else has their heart set on it.
>> > cheers
>> > Cam
>> >
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message