Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B19411E63 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:50:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72038 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2014 13:50:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@curator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71997 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2014 13:50:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@curator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@curator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@curator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71970 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2014 13:50:38 -0000 Received: from tyr.zones.apache.org (HELO tyr.zones.apache.org) (140.211.11.114) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:50:38 +0000 Received: by tyr.zones.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 9E27D9B5176; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:50:38 +0000 (UTC) From: karkum To: dev@curator.apache.org Reply-To: dev@curator.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] curator pull request: CURATOR-84 More flexibility for InterProcess... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20140818135038.9E27D9B5176@tyr.zones.apache.org> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 13:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Github user karkum commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/curator/pull/38#discussion_r16353602 --- Diff: curator-recipes/src/main/java/org/apache/curator/framework/recipes/locks/InterProcessMutex.java --- @@ -61,7 +61,17 @@ private LockData(Thread owningThread, String lockPath) */ public InterProcessMutex(CuratorFramework client, String path) { - this(client, path, LOCK_NAME, 1, new StandardLockInternalsDriver()); + this(client, path, new StandardLockInternalsDriver()); + } + + /** + * @param client client + * @param path the path to lock + * @param driver lock driver + */ + private InterProcessMutex(CuratorFramework client, String path, LockInternalsDriver driver) --- End diff -- Yes, I was just about to comment back. The plan was for a client using the ```InterProcessMutex``` to specify their own ```LockInternalsDriver``` with different parameters than the one provided by the default ```StandardLockInternalsDriver```. We definitely need this to be public. I'm not sure what you mean by "Also LockInternalsDriver would need to be public?". Could you please elaborate? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---