curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Cameron McKenzie <mckenzie....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.6.0
Date Wed, 09 Jul 2014 22:05:38 GMT
Ok, so we have 3 binding +1 votes then?


On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:

> No - his vote was non-binding. Only binding votes count.
>
> -Jordan
>
>
> On July 9, 2014 at 5:02:58 PM, Cameron McKenzie (mckenzie.cam@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> So where does this leave us guys? Presumably the release needs to be
> rebuilt?
> cheers
> Cam
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Jay Zarfoss <zarfide@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Clean build runs fine / all test pass on my Mac.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Please open an issue in Jira for this one. That will touch every file.
> > >
> > > -JZ
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:44:07 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Just noticed another issue - Appendix A needs to be updated in all of
> the
> > > LICENCE files. Instead of providing a year and copyright owner, we
> should
> > > use placeholder values, like in
> > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
> > >
> > > APPENDIX: How to apply the Apache License to your work.
> > >
> > > To apply the Apache License to your work, attach the following
> > > boilerplate notice, with the fields enclosed by brackets "[]"
> > > replaced with your own identifying information. (Don't include
> > > the brackets!) The text should be enclosed in the appropriate
> > > comment syntax for the file format. We also recommend that a
> > > file or class name and description of purpose be included on the
> > > same "printed page" as the copyright notice for easier
> > > identification within third-party archives.
> > >
> > > Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Mike Drob <madrob@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> > > Just expand the header comment match what resides in the pom.xml
> > >
> > > Tomcat is a fine reference -
> > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > > * I’ve removed the dependency-reduced-pom.xml from the project. That
> was
> > a
> > > mistake.
> > > * I’ve updated the license plugins to ignore .json and .thrift
> > >
> > > doap.rdf
> > > What’s incomplete?
> > >
> > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
> assertion.
> > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > > That doap file has been that way for a while. Curator’s doap file
> looks
> > > just like ZooKeeper’s. Without having to dive into the minutia of
> those
> > > docs, can you describe what needs to be added? Or, can you point to
> > another
> > > project’s DOAP file that is better?
> > >
> > > -JZ
> > >
> > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:20:56 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > > This shouldn’t be part of the project
> > >
> > > Then it shouldn't be in the source or the release tag. :)
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > > JSON doesn’t support comments so there’s no way to have license
> headers.
> > > When I run “mvn license:check” it comes back clean (with some warnings
> > > about unknown files).
> > >
> > > Yea, I'm not sure there's anything to be done for these, which is
> > > unfortunate.
> > > doap.rdf
> > > What’s incomplete?
> > >
> > > It doesn't have _any_ licensing information, just a copyright
> assertion.
> > > Check out LEGAL-114 and LEGAL-172 for a long history.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On July 9, 2014 at 10:02:40 AM, Mike Drob (madrob@cloudera.com)
> wrote:
> > >
> > > -1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Verified signature and hashes, all good.
> > >
> > > The git tag does not match the source zip:
> > > * zip contains a file called .test.swp
> > > * zip differs from tag on curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > (brought
> > > up in the other thread)
> > >
> > > Missing licence headers:
> > > * curator-x-rpc/pom.xml
> > > * curator-x-rpc/dependency-reduced-pom.xml
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/thrift/curator.thrift
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/main/resources/curator/help.txt
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/connections.json
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/logging.json
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/simple.json
> > > * curator-x-rpc/src/test/resources/configuration/test.json
> > >
> > > Incomplete licence header:
> > > * doap.rdf
> > >
> > > Attempted to build from source: mvn clean verify
> > > * Compiled cleanly!
> > > * Had a test failure in TestDistributedDelayQueue.testSorting() (fixed
> in
> > > master)
> > > * Had a intermittent test failure in
> > > TestDistributedQueue.testCustomExecutor() (will investigate further)
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Eric Tschetter <echeddar@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Ashish <paliwalashish@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Ran the build. Works fine and all test cases passed
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > > > > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com <javascript:;>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Validated keys
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On July 8, 2014 at 5:08:37 PM, Cameron McKenzie (
> > > > mckenzie.cam@gmail.com
> > > > > <javascript:;>)
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is the vote for Apache Curator version 2.6.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote within approx. 72 hours
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag) and binaries are
> > > > > > provided for convenience.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Link to release
> > > > > > notes:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12327098
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Staging repo:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/curator/2.6.0/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Binary artifacts:
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-1004
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The tag to be voted
> > > > > > upon:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=apache-curator-2.6.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the
> > > > > > release:http://www.apache.org/dist/curator/KEYS
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cam
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > ashish
> > > > >
> > > > > Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
> > > > > My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message