curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.3.0
Date Thu, 07 Nov 2013 04:54:21 GMT
BTW - please re-open the issue and describe the regression, please. 

Thank you.

On Nov 5, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Evaristo José Camarero <evaristo.camarero@yahoo.es> wrote:

> Hi there,
> 
> In previous releases I found problems with PersistentEphemeralNodes themselves or with
ConnectionStateListener when used on a CuratorFramework related with a PersistentEphemeralNode.
> 
> I reported the problems in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-53
> and from there another JIRA was issued by Jordan: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CURATOR-59
> 
> I tested the release with my app and I found some issues with listeners and PersistentEpehemarlNodes
> 
> I attach one example that shows that listener in CF related with PersistentEphemeralNode
is extremely slow compared with a CF non related with a PersistentEphemeralNode
> 
> I see 2 issues here:
> - The client with PEN shows a LOST and the other client does not show it
> - The RECONNECT for the client with PEN is extremely slow
> 
> 
> This is the output of my program in my case:
> 2013/11/05 18:43:18  Client with PEN new stateLOST
> 2013/11/05 18:43:19  Client with PEN new stateCONNECTED
> 2013/11/05 18:43:19  Client without PEN new stateCONNECTED
> Closing server
> 2013/11/05 18:43:19  Client without PEN new stateSUSPENDED
> 2013/11/05 18:43:19  Client with PEN new stateSUSPENDED
> 2013/11/05 18:43:23  Client with PEN new stateLOST
> 2013/11/05 18:43:23  Client without PEN new stateLOST
> Starting server again
> 2013/11/05 18:43:25  Client without PEN new stateRECONNECTED
> 2013/11/05 18:43:48  Client with PEN new stateRECONNECTED
> 
> 
> My app shows also the same problems.
> 
> 
> The rest of functionalities I have tested (LeaderSelector, Caches, Curator Framework
looks OK for me). I have test with my own app and I did not find any issue.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Evaristo
> 
> 
> 
> De: Eric Tschetter <echeddar@gmail.com>
> Para: dev@curator.apache.org 
> Enviado: Martes 5 de noviembre de 2013 17:22
> Asunto: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator version 2.3.0
> 
> +1
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
> > jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > This is a vote to release Apache Curator, version 2.3.0.
> > >
> > > *** Please download, test and vote. The vote will be open for approx. 72
> > > hours
> > >
> > > Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
> > > convenience.
> > >
> > > Link to release notes:
> > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12314425&version=12324984
> > >
> > > Staging repo:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/curator/2.3.0/
> > >        NOTE: still using incubator repo as INFRA hasn’t create TLP yet
> > >
> > > Binary artifacts:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecurator-066/
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon:
> > >
> > >
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=curator.git;a=tag;h=8062805203b48b72a4f5cc2cf27fc97a57993afc
> > >
> > > Curator's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/curator/KEYS
> > >
> > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
> 
> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message