curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Graduate Curator from Apache Incubator
Date Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:37:58 GMT
I'll re-iterate my +1. I don't see anything here that changes my mind.
Incubation is to "Ensure all donations are in accordance with the ASF
legal standards" and "Develop new communities that adhere to our
guiding principles" both of these have been met. There are more than 3
independent committers (4 actually), which is more than enough. A
number of releases have been created and they demonstrate the
community understands Apache. "X more months" as a podling is not
necessary, community can continue to be built as a TLP.

I see ten organizations listed on the poweredby page: The
likelyhood of abandonment seems low. And even if the project is
abandoned it's not a big deal. We have a process for that (attic). It


On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Luciano Resende <> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <
>> wrote:
>> While Apache considers a release to be source code, the rest of the world
>> considers a release to be JAR files on Maven Central. Unless I'm mistaken,
>> releasing the binaries before a vote completes would not be an acceptable
>> thing to do.
>> -JZ
> Although some documentation says that Apache considers a release to be
> source code, most of the java projects I have worked with considers a
> release to be both source and artifact binaries. And you are correct about
> release timing, no release artifact should be released before the vote
> completes. Having said that, I have worked in projects that I needed a
> release every two days, and I was updating my development (pre-production)
> environment with manual (internal) releases, and would wait for the full
> release when I needed to go to production.
> --
> Luciano Resende

View raw message