Mailing-List: contact dev-help@curator.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@curator.incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: 2.0.2 release
From: Jordan Zimmerman <jordan@jordanzimmerman.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB8U+h2Fg-oDY+4dSsyYCKf6uF-0zwK3T1BGTTJQ5i0tHkR8rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:14:15 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BB4905FB-F3F2-4EA8-A036-742094FB1CE6@jordanzimmerman.com>
References: 
 <CAGv3PP+MRPQB2KH3H0j1XoM0WTHc+DX_e+znQnkUa9PMXwnTyg@mail.gmail.com>
 <C3C1D372-8C08-4615-A145-78ED4332457E@jordanzimmerman.com>
 <CAB8U+h2Fg-oDY+4dSsyYCKf6uF-0zwK3T1BGTTJQ5i0tHkR8rA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@curator.incubator.apache.org

I think you're right. I've been using the last digit as a minor change, =
but it's really for patches. I wonder how many patches we'll actually =
have, though. Maybe the patch digit can be done away with altogether and =
we can just use [ma].[mi] versioning.

-JZ

On Jun 19, 2013, at 5:00 PM, Eric Tschetter <echeddar@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have no objections, but would like to clarify the versioning scheme. =
 If
> we are following semantic versioning, then I think those tickets =
warrant a
> 2.1.0.
>=20
> --Eric
>=20
> On Wednesday, June 19, 2013, Jordan Zimmerman wrote:
>=20
>> Barring any objections, I can start a release on the currently =
committed
>> 2.0.2 tickets:
>>=20
>>=20
>> =
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=3D1231442=
5&version=3D12324401
>>=20
>> -Jordan
>>=20
>> On Jun 19, 2013, at 3:18 PM, Narayanan A R <
>> narayanan.arunachalam@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>=20
>>> Hi,
>>>=20
>>> Please schedule a release for 2.0.2. I want to use the callback =
feature
>>> added to sync() operation.
>>>=20
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nara
>>=20
>>=20