Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78C80CD3A for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50510 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2013 16:37:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-curator-dev-archive@curator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50473 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jun 2013 16:37:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@curator.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@curator.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@curator.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50464 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jun 2013 16:37:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:37:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.49] (HELO mail-pa0-f49.google.com) (209.85.220.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 16:37:27 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ld11so9069179pab.8 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:36:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=zxBpcEhhO3MWAXG8f1tDAiHbsxJZbyt1Tyq5o22ridw=; b=Mg3bbAqblBXjCH4b5nPxLUAeiEciDRoQ0DELp74F9hM3K15h3mOXp1vHg8lolCtwBF 6vawP7z/s7Hqfin8ojEM44AAaPNFLUnBWJ/bOYF34wemVZ9/Y2uoQwxYzPZ29vuAtd7Y /J0M9Nl/6f5OOze/mtGiXyM2/Nj1L79muIJsonsynMcoF8QTKylel/wOIKoGA4yFH0BV hYkuutqHiLZI8vDeMZMqvkwl2MqfgUbPRyPfNv3lcdePLoZLv/DRJJrjpJhEC1yMa4F5 pfFswtAHU+ZqocbBgLGPgxHMJnUwynJeCNjpFtOxIJRrxHRDy3v612VZ1rtqw6V9APbB fGgw== X-Received: by 10.68.197.199 with SMTP id iw7mr3227114pbc.110.1371919006201; Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.50] (c-24-130-72-169.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.130.72.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xe9sm9876213pbc.21.2013.06.22.09.36.45 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: Build notifications spamin the dev list From: Jordan Zimmerman In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 09:36:46 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6D3F1AAB-9E20-4738-9CDC-29F496195A08@jordanzimmerman.com> References: To: dev@curator.incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlF+llNSTLTMk6ps967iOAxlv1KL0G+xvR9StjGE1x6aGj1+XH1ptD2lYLpoustHwLAI8mi X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've been fixing them. I fixed a major one having to do with git tags = (Apache/Jenkins issue). And I'm working on the other ones. -JZ On Jun 21, 2013, at 8:48 PM, Luciano Resende = wrote: > When I open my curator dev list folder, most all the things I see is = failed > build notifications. I think that this is usually bad for someone that = is > coming fresh to the community, where the first impression will be that > there is nothing much going on other then broken code. >=20 > Could we look into other ways we could handle this ? Fixing the build = would > be the best, but maybe reducing the frequency of the builds or just = sending > e-mails to whoever broke the build (and then only have a daily build = that > goes to the dev list) ? >=20 > Thanks >=20 > --=20 > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > http://lresende.blogspot.com/