curator-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator 2.0.0-incubating
Date Wed, 03 Apr 2013 21:57:44 GMT
I'm biased but I wouldn't follow ZK. It's based on what Hadoop was doing
way back when and not current best practice. I'd take what you're currently
doing (structure that's best for your project) and make sure you follow the
release criteria from the docs. See the checklist on the release page for
the main items.

Patrick



On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <randgalt@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > This isn't how I see other Apache projects. I just downloaded the
> > ZooKeeper source and the packaging is just ZooKeeper.
> >
> > For Curator, the group Id is apache and the project in the pom is Apache
> > Curator. That should be enough, right?
> >
> > -JZ
> >
> > On Mar 29, 2013, at 4:42 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > - the project is not curator, it's Apache Curator, so we usually prefix
> > > apache on the distro
> >
> >
> I particularly don't think that Zookeeper packaging structure is one of the
> best, but if you want to follow that particularly due to proximity of the
> two projects, I'm ok with it. But note that they do produce a lib with the
> binaries and dependencies.
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message