Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ctakes-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ctakes-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82E651041E for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 2884 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 12:45:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ctakes-user-archive@ctakes.apache.org Received: (qmail 2715 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 12:45:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ctakes.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@ctakes.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@ctakes.apache.org Received: (qmail 2686 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2014 12:45:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:45:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kincaid.dave@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.53] (HELO mail-oa0-f53.google.com) (209.85.219.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 12:45:28 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id j17so2427237oag.40 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 05:45:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=5aNF3M/g03DUueit32fSms6/e02YQG9aXLBzHwQDDC4=; b=SGtsMz0TkkznRLFybprGYU7RVs5b8yqo7vRgrR3Z2atwxlg0lWFIaC0oR+5Nq/XdHD oeoFYWI/qQcyymkYUDZF+6IvPol9G3Mv6LPltp2qZQBrCjZLOpCfkTGu3bnn//JeKi7C pn0Gm3MyuFR+Cnzn7aqMeh3MBV1PJov5undQ5gJ3ZBv1hgmQBEhIsWCfQGnQFfizDYQO rbulVZvXjNceLjj0VV+dOM7B/bHhVUD+1VKSaw3wOqQxI0QJo/mGoo95BzYvcBj9QYL7 KNDMs4sfOb2Uxg4aRX0kssxYI6izOMSlKy8FxqdM4GRseKCRCfjmPbncW5JAUYbffVw7 RRJg== X-Received: by 10.60.134.137 with SMTP id pk9mr16536222oeb.40.1395837906729; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 05:45:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.28.41 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 05:44:26 -0700 (PDT) From: David Kincaid Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:44:26 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Improving cTAKES performance "out of the box" To: user@ctakes.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b471dfa983f5f04f581d619 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b471dfa983f5f04f581d619 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I've been starting to work with cTAKES recently and trying out the clinical pipeline on some documents. I was wondering what were some of the first things that people are modifying to improve the performance? When I look at the annotations after running some discharge documents through, the performance on negation, history of, concept detection (medications, signs/symptoms, disease/disorder, etc), etc are not very good. Are there newer components or models that people are plugging in? I've only just started working with it (although I have been following the project for some time) as a side project/proof of concept to try to get some funding for a bigger project. This looks like a very good starting point and I'm hoping to get a chance to work with it a lot more. I appreciate any advice the group might have. Thanks, Dave Kincaid --047d7b471dfa983f5f04f581d619 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've been starting to work with cTAKES recently and tr= ying out the clinical pipeline on some documents. I was wondering what were= some of the first things that people are modifying to improve the performa= nce? When I look at the annotations after running some discharge documents = through, the performance on negation, history of, concept detection (medica= tions, signs/symptoms, disease/disorder, etc), etc are not very good. Are t= here newer components or models that people are plugging in?

I've only just started working with it (although I have = been following the project for some time) as a side project/proof of concep= t to try to get some funding for a bigger project. This looks like a very g= ood starting point and I'm hoping to get a chance to work with it a lot= more. I appreciate any advice the group might have.

Thanks,

Dave Kincaid
--047d7b471dfa983f5f04f581d619--