Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ctakes-notifications-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ctakes-notifications-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 60E1E18990 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:44:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42767 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2015 16:44:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ctakes-notifications-archive@ctakes.apache.org Received: (qmail 42578 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2015 16:44:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact notifications-help@ctakes.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list notifications@ctakes.apache.org Received: (qmail 42553 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2015 16:44:28 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:44:28 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AEC2C1F5C for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:44:28 +0000 (UTC) From: "Omkar Natu (JIRA)" To: notifications@ctakes.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-369) UmlsConcept subject is not recognized propely MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14980751#comment-14980751 ] Omkar Natu commented on CTAKES-369: ----------------------------------- Does anyone have an update on this issue? We're seeing the same thing and it is pivotal that we get a fix for it. Even if someone can point us in the right direction (i.e. the file and approximate time the issue arose), we'd be happy to help out. Thanks! > UmlsConcept subject is not recognized propely > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: CTAKES-369 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-369 > Project: cTAKES > Issue Type: Bug > Components: ctakes-assertion, ctakes-clinical-pipeline > Affects Versions: 3.2.2 > Environment: Linux > Reporter: Tomasz Oliwa > Attachments: family_history.txt > > > Hi, > I think there is a regression in the way cTAKES discovers the subject status ("patient", "familiy_member", etc.) of an UmlsConcept. Using cTAKES 3.2.2 and the AggregatePlaintextFastUMLSProcessor of the clinical pipeline in the CVD: > 1. "Patient's brother has a myocardial infarction." > "myocardial infarction" and "infarction" have subject = "patient" > 2. "Father had a myocardial infarction." > "myocardial infarction" and "infarction" have subject = "patient" > 3. "Sister was diagnosed with a myocardial infarction." > "myocardial infarction" and "infarction" have subject = "patient" > 4. "Family member had a myocardial infarction." > "myocardial infarction" and "infarction" have subject = "family_member" (this is correct) > I am looking at the code of the SubjectCleartkAnalysisEngine. It looks like this is the code the pipeline calls to inferr the subject. How can this be fixed? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)