ctakes-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Joseph Masanz (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-226) CEM Templates- In the xxxMentions locations/severity store Annotation instead of the BinaryTextRelation
Date Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:43:56 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13747605#comment-13747605
] 

James Joseph Masanz commented on CTAKES-226:
--------------------------------------------

I was thinking more for demo purposes and for learning purposes than for debugging.
When giving a demo, if you ask for sample text from the audience, sometimes people ask why
this or that was annotated and it takes some digging to find out why.
Similarly people just learning about cTAKES are sometimes wondering what is going on.



                
> CEM Templates- In the xxxMentions locations/severity store Annotation instead of the
BinaryTextRelation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CTAKES-226
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-226
>             Project: cTAKES
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>            Reporter: Pei Chen
>             Fix For: future enhancement
>
>
> > Hi James/Steven,
> > In the common type system/template fillers, do you recall why we 
> > stored the TextRelation instead of the resolved annotation?
> >
> > For example, in SignSymptomMention, getBodyLocation() returns 
> > LocationOfTextRelation.
> > So in order to actually get the AnatomicalSiteMention, you would have 
> > to look inside LocationOfTextRelation arg1 or arg2.
> >
> > I think it be more intuitive and simpler for consumers of the CEM's to 
> > just store the AnatomicalSiteMention?  Is there a use case I am 
> > missing where someone would want something different than the
> > SignSymptomMention.getBodyLocation() other than the actual 
> > AnatomicalSiteMention?
> Email Thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ctakes-dev/201308.mbox/%3C924DE05C19409B438EB81DE683A942D910588E15%40CHEXMBX1A.CHBOSTON.ORG%3E

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message