ctakes-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Joseph Masanz (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-226) CEM Templates- In the xxxMentions locations/severity store Annotation instead of the BinaryTextRelation
Date Wed, 21 Aug 2013 18:29:52 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13746684#comment-13746684
] 

James Joseph Masanz commented on CTAKES-226:
--------------------------------------------

other nice-to-have along these lines would be 
(1) the words within the text that caused the annotation to be created.
(2) the words of the dictionary entry that caused the annotation to be created.

(1) is especially useful when there are intervening words within the text. 
For the phrase "cancer of colon, lung and liver" annotated with  93870000 due to the words
"cancer" and "liver"

(2) is especially useful when the preferred term does not share any words in common with a
dictionary entry (due to synonyms)


                
> CEM Templates- In the xxxMentions locations/severity store Annotation instead of the
BinaryTextRelation
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CTAKES-226
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-226
>             Project: cTAKES
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.1
>            Reporter: Pei Chen
>             Fix For: future enhancement
>
>
> > Hi James/Steven,
> > In the common type system/template fillers, do you recall why we 
> > stored the TextRelation instead of the resolved annotation?
> >
> > For example, in SignSymptomMention, getBodyLocation() returns 
> > LocationOfTextRelation.
> > So in order to actually get the AnatomicalSiteMention, you would have 
> > to look inside LocationOfTextRelation arg1 or arg2.
> >
> > I think it be more intuitive and simpler for consumers of the CEM's to 
> > just store the AnatomicalSiteMention?  Is there a use case I am 
> > missing where someone would want something different than the
> > SignSymptomMention.getBodyLocation() other than the actual 
> > AnatomicalSiteMention?
> Email Thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ctakes-dev/201308.mbox/%3C924DE05C19409B438EB81DE683A942D910588E15%40CHEXMBX1A.CHBOSTON.ORG%3E

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message