ctakes-notifications mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Wu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-131) Reconcile Type System with the updated CEM templates
Date Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:53:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13590975#comment-13590975
] 

Stephen Wu commented on CTAKES-131:
-----------------------------------

Unfortunately, we don't have a great distinction between the two.  Most of them are indicator
mentions, i.e., by the very fact that the modifier exists at all, indicate non-default cases.
 So I think it's ok for those, at least, to not have Attributes.

The only one that does not fit that description is SubjectModifier.  Maybe we should create
a Subject Attribute (which is really a Person).  Downside to this, and leaving these non-homogenized,
is that it is a little trickier to retrieve the data from these types.  You have to know whether
to look at things like XXXMention.getSubject().getNormalizedForm() sometimes, but then sometimes
you can look at XXXMention.getGeneric() and that's all you need.

So maybe just leave as-is right now.

stephen
                
> Reconcile Type System with the updated CEM templates
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CTAKES-131
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-131
>             Project: cTAKES
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ctakes-type-system
>            Reporter: Stephen Wu
>            Assignee: Stephen Wu
>            Priority: Minor
>
> There are new things in the general CEM templates that have not been added to the type
system.  This includes new features (e.g., historyOf) and semantic types (e.g., Devices) that
were not previously represented or annotated.
> Some of these are being annotated, some of them are not.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message