ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Miller, Timothy" <Timothy.Mil...@childrens.harvard.edu>
Subject headword field in identifiedannotations
Date Thu, 09 Jun 2016 21:13:59 GMT
How do people feel about modifying the typesystem? I'm finding that
grabbing the dependency headword is something very useful for feature
extraction. But it is a bottleneck if every feature extractor that uses
it has to recompute it. So I propose adding a field to the
IdentifiedAnnotation type of "headNode" with type ConllDependencyNode.

Any thoughts or good reasons to avoid this?

Thanks
Tim

Mime
View raw message