ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Kincaid <kincaid.d...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: rule-based negation annotator
Date Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:35:23 GMT
Is this new negation module different that the NE Contexts negation
annotator already in cTAKES or is it an update of it? Is it still based on

- Dave

On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Miller, Timothy <
Timothy.Miller@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:

> Hello,
> I am starting to look at the negation annotators since we've had some
> reports that the machine learning module is missing some obvious negations.
> I've checked in an updated *Rule Based* version so that I can use it in
> modern uimafit-style pipelines. It has all the same default parameters so
> this shouldn't affect anyone using it "out of the box". I have decided not
> to spend time testing it in an old-style xml descriptor with modified
> parameters, because I think most people are (or should be) moving away from
> that style, and not using that annoator anyways. If you are using it that
> way I can't guarantee it will still work the same. Please let me know (via
> this list) if you run into any issues and we can work through it together.
> Thanks
> Tim
> ?

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message