Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ctakes-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ctakes-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E9661880F for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:48:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8492 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2015 17:47:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ctakes-dev-archive@ctakes.apache.org Received: (qmail 8452 invoked by uid 500); 8 Dec 2015 17:47:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ctakes.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ctakes.apache.org Received: (qmail 8439 invoked by uid 99); 8 Dec 2015 17:47:55 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:47:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 46328C08BA for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:47:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.88 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wui8vHjvKn6N for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f179.google.com (mail-ob0-f179.google.com [209.85.214.179]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5C3D242BB8 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obcse5 with SMTP id se5so17856171obc.3 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:47:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Y3yCtGBpuunxoOLg32DelooulLp6pEA63s2c6suv5Tg=; b=zIA29POxHlbGQisZh3LXjPh9zeE7CHpWwWN4CLsBb1kD/CjlWE78iv34a5g+/cHCVU xu9kIqQdZdZBr0oMJDetptLCOzzEP/erj33U7tFFgSw3+IhGD6hqmR1S/wS+nZcMjhjE i3+ZsMYd6XDBr8wp8/NUOJtjVPoM8q5pJD6lHYLLjt+y/cq6QP4tKzdgYDn9AOBVLBDh Qp5MYplPW77Bs2mj4atnC/cSHNaxRQD4B7fRWKzmH+yB/qGRMFGSv5RVDcHveVj99Y+u I6nTMw/g9AwSR37KZlgIspcBTVxKb2oW+6ricGj+rEK4S8NDgcqWTxmLkzdUGmQ638Fd K7yA== X-Received: by 10.182.19.234 with SMTP id i10mr682994obe.67.1449596863551; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:47:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.168.225 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:47:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20ba22aa11b340d08ab09adfc89e7141@CHEXMAIL1A.CHBOSTON.ORG> References: <20ba22aa11b340d08ab09adfc89e7141@CHEXMAIL1A.CHBOSTON.ORG> From: David Kincaid Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 11:47:04 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ctakes with icd10 To: "dev@ctakes.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2c7be1e9f2005266692fe --001a11c2c7be1e9f2005266692fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 This seems like a pretty common request and with such an old version of UMLS database shipped with cTAKES it's only going to get worse. I've been wanting to build a dictionary using the latest UMLS release (as well as a custom database), so would be happy to write up the steps as I go through it. That assumes that I can dig up the instructions in the dev list. - Dave On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Finan, Sean < Sean.Finan@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: > Hi Alaa, > > The -shortest- answer is that you'll need to run the dictionary creation > tool. There are instructions in older devlist threads. By default the > dictionary creation tool does add icd9 and icd10 tables to the dictionary. > The problem is that in Umls 2011AB those codes weren't very well > populated. The 2015AB icd# set is much more rich so those tables should be > pretty good. Then in ctakes you would look up annotations by icd9 or icd10 > codes instead of by cui: > OntologyConceptUtil.getAnnotationsByCode( jcas, lookupWindow, icd#Code ); > OntologyConceptUtil.getAnnotationsByCode( jcas, icd#Code ); > > Sean > > -----Original Message----- > From: Savova, Guergana [mailto:Guergana.Savova@childrens.harvard.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 12:17 PM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: RE: ctakes with icd10 > > Hi Alaa, > You need to create a resource off the terminology/ontology you want to use > (in this case ICD9 or ICD10). Then run that resource with cTAKES for the > fast dictionary lookup. There is cTAKES code and some documentation on how > to create that resource. By default, cTAKES runs with a resource created > from the English version of SNOMED CT and RxNORM. > Hope this helps. > --Guergana > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alaa al Barari [mailto:alaa.albarari@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 10:01 AM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: ctakes with icd10 > > Hi, > > I downloaded Latest umls version, and I want to know how to make ctakes > work with icd10 and icd9. > > > Thanks > --001a11c2c7be1e9f2005266692fe--