Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ctakes-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ctakes-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A464E18BC5 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14797 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2015 14:51:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ctakes-dev-archive@ctakes.apache.org Received: (qmail 14742 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2015 14:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ctakes.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ctakes.apache.org Received: (qmail 14730 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2015 14:51:58 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:51:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B91D21A2FC7 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:51:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DpkFctm9_J_s for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailsmtp1.childrenshospital.org (mailsmtp1.childrenshospital.org [134.174.13.91]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C245920B92 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 14:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pps.filterd (mailsmtp1.childrenshospital.org [127.0.0.1]) by mailsmtp1.childrenshospital.org (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id t4JEoRQH013402 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:51:54 -0400 Received: from smtpndc2.chboston.org (smtpndc2.chboston.org [10.20.50.105]) by mailsmtp1.childrenshospital.org with ESMTP id 1udxytehm4-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:51:54 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (smtpndc2.chboston.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtpndc2.chboston.org (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with SMTP id t4JEpqtc003751 for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:51:53 -0400 Received: from chexhubcas2.chboston.org (internal-ndc-nat-v1260.tch.harvard.edu [10.20.50.4]) by smtpndc2.chboston.org with ESMTP id 1udyuqes80-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:51:53 -0400 Received: from CHEXMBX3C.CHBOSTON.ORG ([fe80::6d14:6390:7d91:be47]) by CHEXHUBCAS2.CHBOSTON.ORG ([fe80::c21:dbf:ff97:edca%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Tue, 19 May 2015 10:51:52 -0400 From: "Miller, Timothy" To: "dev@ctakes.apache.org" Subject: Re: OpenNLP VS UIMA, general question. Thread-Topic: OpenNLP VS UIMA, general question. Thread-Index: AQHQkj1DcTj+XqWItki+YFeblOXp0A== Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 14:51:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.7.2.218] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2015-05-19_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2015-05-19_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1502090000 definitions=main-1505190186 I'm not totally sure I understand your question. But if you are asking=0A= if it's possible to use the clinical-trained OpenNLP models released=0A= with cTAKES without using UIMA, yes, it should be possible. Some of the=0A= cTAKES modules simply wrap OpenNLP APIs, and convert the=0A= POS-tagged/Chunked/Parsed output into the UIMA typesystem.=0A= =0A= Or are you asking if you can write a UIMA annotator that consumes=0A= OpenNLP annotations rather than cTAKES' UIMA-based annotations? That is=0A= possible too, though would definitely add complexity to a UIMA pipeline.=0A= =0A= Tim=0A= =0A= On 05/19/2015 10:08 AM, Damir Olejar wrote:=0A= > To whom it may concern,=0A= >=0A= > I would like to ask whether it is possible to have a code written for=0A= > OpenNLP and then, if necessary, integrate it with UIMA. Furthermore, is = it=0A= > possible to go from UIMA to OpenNLP ? For example, I am interested in a= =0A= > medical analysis with cTakes, but I cannot find a way how to do it using= =0A= > only the OpenNLP.=0A= >=0A= > The reason why I want to rely on OpenNLP as much as possible, is simply d= ue=0A= > to a complexity of applications I am developing, and UIMA would simply=0A= > complicate everything without a necessity.=0A= >=0A= > Thank you kindly for your answers!=0A= >=0A= > Damir Olejar=0A= >=0A= =0A=