ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Damir Olejar <olejar.da...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OpenNLP VS UIMA, general question.
Date Tue, 19 May 2015 15:03:18 GMT
Yes, that is exactly what I was asking!
Thank you, and sorry for not being more thorough with the questions, as I
am new to cTakes.

Damir

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Miller, Timothy <
Timothy.Miller@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:

> I'm not totally sure I understand your question. But if you are asking
> if it's possible to use the clinical-trained OpenNLP models released
> with cTAKES without using UIMA, yes, it should be possible. Some of the
> cTAKES modules simply wrap OpenNLP APIs, and convert the
> POS-tagged/Chunked/Parsed output into the UIMA typesystem.
>
> Or are you asking if you can write a UIMA annotator that consumes
> OpenNLP annotations rather than cTAKES' UIMA-based annotations? That is
> possible too, though would definitely add complexity to a UIMA pipeline.
>
> Tim
>
> On 05/19/2015 10:08 AM, Damir Olejar wrote:
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > I would like to ask whether it is possible to have a code written for
> > OpenNLP and then, if necessary, integrate it with UIMA.  Furthermore, is
> it
> > possible to go from UIMA to OpenNLP ? For example, I am interested in a
> > medical analysis with cTakes, but I cannot find a way how to do it using
> > only the OpenNLP.
> >
> > The reason why I want to rely on OpenNLP as much as possible, is simply
> due
> > to a complexity of applications I am developing, and UIMA would simply
> > complicate everything without a necessity.
> >
> > Thank you kindly for your answers!
> >
> > Damir Olejar
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message