ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5...@rit.edu>
Subject Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
Date Tue, 22 Jul 2014 20:19:18 GMT
I will try to do the same.

Thank you,

Harpreet


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Masanz, James J. <Masanz.James@mayo.edu>
wrote:

>
> I'm not an svn guru, but you can use Team->Update to get the latest of all
> the things you have not customized, plus SVN will tell you of the
> conflicts, and you can merge your customizations into the latest. I've done
> it when I haven't had many customizations to preserve.
>
> To get the new dictionary lookup (sub)project, you might have to do
> something to get it imported, such as going into the SVN repository
> exploring view and use Check out as Maven Project menu option on that
> (sub)project.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5004@rit.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:32 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
>
> Hello,
>
> I checked out 3.1.1 from trunk SVN.
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Masanz, James J. <Masanz.James@mayo.edu>
> wrote:
>
> > Did you download the source and import into eclipse, or did you check out
> > 3.1.1 from SVN.
> > If you checked it out from SVN, did you check it out from trunk, or from
> > the tag for 3.1.1.
> >
> > -- James
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5004@rit.edu]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:49 PM
> > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
> >
> > Hello,
> >    I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in eclipse and I have added my customizations
> to
> > the project, but now I want to update it to 3.2 so that I can use
> >    ctakes-dictionary-lookup-fast.
> >    Is there any way to update the whole ctakes project to 3.2 without my
> > customizations getting removed?
> >
> >   It would be a great help.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Harpreet
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5004@g.rit.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you so much for your help.
> > >
> > > Harpreet.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Finan, Sean <
> > > Sean.Finan@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Harpreet,
> > >>
> > >> If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast
> > >> module as a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup.  That module
> > has
> > >> a new dictionary resource (hsql, not lucene) and slightly different
> > methods
> > >> for lookup and matching.  In time trials it has been faster than the
> > >> default module (hence the name).  Accuracy depends upon the parameter
> > >> settings, but in the tests performed so far the results are comparable
> > or
> > >> better.  The new dictionary is much leaner than the current default
> > >> dictionary, small enough to port from the hsql cached version to a
> hsql
> > >> in-memory version.  Using the in-memory version makes dictionary
> lookup
> > >> practically instantaneous (hundredths of a second).  Limited
> > documentation
> > >> is available in the module's doc/ directory.
> > >>
> > >> I will be on vacation for a week, but please don't hesitate to write
> if
> > >> you have any questions.
> > >>
> > >> Sean
> > >> ________________________________________
> > >> From: Harpreet Khanduja [hsk5004@rit.edu]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:07 PM
> > >> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Lucene for UMLS2014
> > >>
> > >> Hello,
> > >>     I would be grateful if someone could help.
> > >>
> > >>     I created a lucene index for umls2014 but only for snomed
> > vocabulary.
> > >>     I did this because I thought this would reduce the dictionary look
> > up
> > >> time.
> > >>     But it still almost the same. Is there any other way to improve
> the
> > >> dictionary look up time?
> > >>
> > >> Thank you,
> > >> Harpreet
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message