ctakes-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5...@rit.edu>
Subject Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
Date Wed, 23 Jul 2014 19:24:03 GMT
Hello,
 Thanks for your help.

It works but it does not give me the code value associated with a cui for
SNOMED vocabulary.
How can I get the code value for SNOMED  or any other vocabulary.

"codingScheme" : "CTakes",  "cui" :          "C0085580",  "tui" :
 "T047",   "code" :         ""

Thank you,

Harpreet




On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5004@g.rit.edu>
wrote:

> I will try to do the same.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Harpreet
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Masanz, James J. <Masanz.James@mayo.edu>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm not an svn guru, but you can use Team->Update to get the latest of
>> all the things you have not customized, plus SVN will tell you of the
>> conflicts, and you can merge your customizations into the latest. I've done
>> it when I haven't had many customizations to preserve.
>>
>> To get the new dictionary lookup (sub)project, you might have to do
>> something to get it imported, such as going into the SVN repository
>> exploring view and use Check out as Maven Project menu option on that
>> (sub)project.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5004@rit.edu]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:32 PM
>> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I checked out 3.1.1 from trunk SVN.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Masanz, James J. <Masanz.James@mayo.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Did you download the source and import into eclipse, or did you check
>> out
>> > 3.1.1 from SVN.
>> > If you checked it out from SVN, did you check it out from trunk, or from
>> > the tag for 3.1.1.
>> >
>> > -- James
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Harpreet Khanduja [mailto:hsk5004@rit.edu]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 12:49 PM
>> > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: Lucene for UMLS2014
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >    I am using ctakes 3.1.1 in eclipse and I have added my
>> customizations to
>> > the project, but now I want to update it to 3.2 so that I can use
>> >    ctakes-dictionary-lookup-fast.
>> >    Is there any way to update the whole ctakes project to 3.2 without my
>> > customizations getting removed?
>> >
>> >   It would be a great help.
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Harpreet
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Harpreet Khanduja <hsk5004@g.rit.edu>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thank you so much for your help.
>> > >
>> > > Harpreet.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Finan, Sean <
>> > > Sean.Finan@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Hi Harpreet,
>> > >>
>> > >> If you are willing to use cTakes 3.2, try the dictionary-lookup-fast
>> > >> module as a replacement of the default dictionary-lookup.  That
>> module
>> > has
>> > >> a new dictionary resource (hsql, not lucene) and slightly different
>> > methods
>> > >> for lookup and matching.  In time trials it has been faster than the
>> > >> default module (hence the name).  Accuracy depends upon the parameter
>> > >> settings, but in the tests performed so far the results are
>> comparable
>> > or
>> > >> better.  The new dictionary is much leaner than the current default
>> > >> dictionary, small enough to port from the hsql cached version to a
>> hsql
>> > >> in-memory version.  Using the in-memory version makes dictionary
>> lookup
>> > >> practically instantaneous (hundredths of a second).  Limited
>> > documentation
>> > >> is available in the module's doc/ directory.
>> > >>
>> > >> I will be on vacation for a week, but please don't hesitate to write
>> if
>> > >> you have any questions.
>> > >>
>> > >> Sean
>> > >> ________________________________________
>> > >> From: Harpreet Khanduja [hsk5004@rit.edu]
>> > >> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 5:07 PM
>> > >> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
>> > >> Subject: Lucene for UMLS2014
>> > >>
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>     I would be grateful if someone could help.
>> > >>
>> > >>     I created a lucene index for umls2014 but only for snomed
>> > vocabulary.
>> > >>     I did this because I thought this would reduce the dictionary
>> look
>> > up
>> > >> time.
>> > >>     But it still almost the same. Is there any other way to improve
>> the
>> > >> dictionary look up time?
>> > >>
>> > >> Thank you,
>> > >> Harpreet
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message